Difference between revisions of "Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|PersonType=Author" to "|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors")
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|HasDnzPage=No
 
|HasDnzPage=No
 
|HasBnwPage=Yes
 
|HasBnwPage=Yes
|PersonType=Author
+
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors
 
|MainNameWylie=rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
 
|MainNameWylie=rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
 
|MainNameTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་
 
|MainNameTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་

Revision as of 16:48, 6 April 2018

Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen on the DRL

རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་
Wylie rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
Other names
  • རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་
  • དགའ་ལྡན་ཁྲི་པ་༠༢་
  • rgyal tshab rje
  • dga' ldan khri pa 02
Alternate names
  • Ganden Tripa, 2nd
Dates
Birth:   1364
Death:   1432
Place of birth:   myang stod ri nang (gtsang)


Tibetan calendar dates

Dates of birth
Day
Month
Gender Male
Element Wood
Animal Dragon
Rab Jyung 6
About
Religious Affiliation
dge lugs
Teachers
Tsong kha pa · Red mda' ba gzhon nu blo gros
Students
'jam dbyangs chos rje bkra shis dpal ldan · Dalai Lama, 1st · mkhas grub rje · 'dul 'dzin grags pa rgyal mtshan

Other Biographical info:

Alternative birth date 1362.

  • one of the two chief disciples of tsong kha pa and his first successor on the see of dga' ldan, 1419-1431.
dga' ldan dgon pa dang brag yer pa'i lo rgyus (p. 58)
  • birth 1364 at ri nang (nyang stod)
  • Assumes Office 1419 Dga' ldan khri at dga' ldan dgon (stag rtse rdzong)
  • Leaves Office 1431 Dga' ldan khri at dga' ldan dgon (stag rtse rdzong)
  • death 1432
  • Took the degree of dka' bcu pa at sa skya, gsang phu, and rtsed thang.
debated against rong ston and against g.yag phrug pa.
1419: came to the throne of dga' ldan and served ll years.
gsung 'bum in 8 volumes.
Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P65
Treasury of Lives Link
https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Gyeltsab-Darma-Rinchen/9095
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position: Definitive
Notes: "So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakävatära and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 107.
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Qualified Yes
If "Qualified", explain: "Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathägata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathägata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood."
Notes: Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 99.
Which Wheel Turning
Position: Second Turning
Notes: "So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakävatära and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 107.
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position: Madhyamaka
Notes: "In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamätra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Präsangika-Madhyamaka." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 98.
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position: Rangtong
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position: 1
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
Notes: "In brief, Gyeltsap argues that buddha-nature, or tathägataessence, does not refer to a fully enlightened entity covered by adventitious defilements. Rather it is the same as the emptiness of inherent existence that is explicated in texts such as the Prajnäpäramitäsütras and Madhyamakävatära." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 106.
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position: Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
Notes: "In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gveltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamätra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Präsangika-Madhyamaka." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 98.
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position:

"Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.