Sa skya paN+Di ta: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
#"As a proponent of the Madhyamaka view of the emptiness of inherent existence privileging the Madhyamakavatära, Sapen strongly argues against the tathâgata-essence concept that is central in the Uttaratantra. In his important work, Distinguishing the Three Vows, Sapen shows that the Uttaratantra requires interpretation." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 26. | #"As a proponent of the Madhyamaka view of the emptiness of inherent existence privileging the Madhyamakavatära, Sapen strongly argues against the tathâgata-essence concept that is central in the Uttaratantra. In his important work, Distinguishing the Three Vows, Sapen shows that the Uttaratantra requires interpretation." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 26. | ||
#"In verses 138-42 of Distinguishing the Three Vows,17 Sapen further argues that the tathâgata-essence teaching in the Uttaratantra and other works of the tathâgata-essence literary corpus are provisional, because it meets the three criteria that are characteristics of the Buddha's provisional teachings. The three criteria are the point of reference (dgongs gzhi), purpose (dgos pa), and counter to the fact (dngos la gnod byed)." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | #"In verses 138-42 of Distinguishing the Three Vows,17 Sapen further argues that the tathâgata-essence teaching in the Uttaratantra and other works of the tathâgata-essence literary corpus are provisional, because it meets the three criteria that are characteristics of the Buddha's provisional teachings. The three criteria are the point of reference (dgongs gzhi), purpose (dgos pa), and counter to the fact (dngos la gnod byed)." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=No | |PosAllBuddha=Qualified No | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="In verses 59-63 of Sapen's Distinguishing the Three Vows, he argues against the presentation of the existence of a tathâgata-essence or sugata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities in sentient beings. Sapen demonstrates that such a position would be tantamount to holding the view of the Sämkhya School, that the "result | |PosAllBuddhaNote=There seems to be some discrepancy between Sapen's use of the term Tathagata-essence and buddha-nature. Sentient beings do not possess the former, but do possess a more general for of the latter. See notes below. | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=*"In verses 59-63 of Sapen's Distinguishing the Three Vows, he argues against the presentation of the existence of a tathâgata-essence or sugata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities in sentient beings. Sapen demonstrates that such a position would be tantamount to holding the view of the Sämkhya School, that the "result | |||
is present in its cause." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | is present in its cause." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | ||
*"It is evident from Distinguishing the Three Vows that the tathâgataessence endowed with enlightened qualities does not exist in sentient beings. But does that mean that Sapen completely rejects the existence of tathägata-essence in sentient beings?" [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], pp. 27-28. | |||
*"In Distinguishing the Three Vows, Sapen argues that tathägataessence, | |||
sugata-essence, buddha-essence, and buddha-element are synonyms, but, interestingly, he never mentions the associated term "buddha-nature" in this context. However, in his Illuminating the Thoughts of the Buddha (thub pa'i dgongs pa rab tu gsal ba), Sapen explains buddha-nature in this way: "The inherent [buddha-]nature exists in all sentient beings. The developmental [buddha-]nature exists [from the time that] one has developed bodhicitta. [The latter] does not exist in those who have not developed [bodhicitta]." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 28. | |||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes=[[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]],p. 310: Sa-pan regards the intentional ground of Buddha-nature to be emptiness. | |PosEmptyLuminNotes=[[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]],p. 310: Sa-pan regards the intentional ground of Buddha-nature to be emptiness. |
Revision as of 09:28, 19 March 2018
PersonType | Category:Author |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Sakya Paṇḍita |
MainNameTib | ས་སྐྱ་པཎྜི་ཏ་ |
MainNameWylie | sa skya paN+Di ta |
AltNamesTib | ཀུན་དགའ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་ · ས་སྐྱ་པཎྜི་ཏ་ཀུན་དགའ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་ |
AltNamesWylie | kun dga' rgyal mtshan · sa skya paN+Di ta kun dga' rgyal mtshan |
AltNamesOther | Sapaṇ |
YearBirth | 1182 |
YearDeath | 1251 |
TibDateGender | Male |
TibDateElement | Water |
TibDateAnimal | Tiger |
TibDateRabjung | 3 |
ReligiousAffiliation | Sakya |
PersonalAffiliation | Grandson of Sachen Kunga Nyingpo and nephew of rje btsun grags pa rgyal mtshan and bsod nams rtse mo, and uncle of chos rgyal 'phags pa. |
StudentOf | Kha che paN chen shAkya shrI · rje btsun grags pa rgyal mtshan |
TeacherOf | gu ru chos kyi dbang phyug · chos rgyal 'phags pa · yang dgon pa rgyal mtshan dpal |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P1056 |
Treasury of Lives | http://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Sakya-Pan%E1%B8%8Dita-Kunga-Gyeltsen/2137 |
Himalayan Art Resources | https://www.himalayanart.org/search/set.cfm?setID=325 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
PosBuNayDefProv | Provisional |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes |
|
PosAllBuddha | Qualified No |
PosAllBuddhaNote | There seems to be some discrepancy between Sapen's use of the term Tathagata-essence and buddha-nature. Sentient beings do not possess the former, but do possess a more general for of the latter. See notes below. |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes |
is present in its cause." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 27.
sugata-essence, buddha-essence, and buddha-element are synonyms, but, interestingly, he never mentions the associated term "buddha-nature" in this context. However, in his Illuminating the Thoughts of the Buddha (thub pa'i dgongs pa rab tu gsal ba), Sapen explains buddha-nature in this way: "The inherent [buddha-]nature exists in all sentient beings. The developmental [buddha-]nature exists [from the time that] one has developed bodhicitta. [The latter] does not exist in those who have not developed [bodhicitta]." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 28. |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness,p. 310: Sa-pan regards the intentional ground of Buddha-nature to be emptiness. |
PosSvataPrasa | Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་) |
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.