Sa skya paN+Di ta: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*"In verses 138-42 of Distinguishing the Three Vows,17 Sapen further argues that the tathâgata-essence teaching in the Uttaratantra and other works of the tathâgata-essence literary corpus are provisional, because it meets the three criteria that are characteristics of the Buddha's provisional teachings. The three criteria are the point of reference (dgongs gzhi), purpose (dgos pa), and counter to the fact (dngos la gnod byed)." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | *"In verses 138-42 of Distinguishing the Three Vows,17 Sapen further argues that the tathâgata-essence teaching in the Uttaratantra and other works of the tathâgata-essence literary corpus are provisional, because it meets the three criteria that are characteristics of the Buddha's provisional teachings. The three criteria are the point of reference (dgongs gzhi), purpose (dgos pa), and counter to the fact (dngos la gnod byed)." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Qualified No | |PosAllBuddha=Qualified No | ||
|PosAllBuddhaNote=There is some discrepancy between Sapen's use of the term tathagata-essence and buddha-nature and other thinkers that use these terms synonymously. In Sapen's view, sentient beings do not possess the former, but do possess a more general form of the latter. So while the answer is a qualified "no" in terms of the more general debate on this issue and the way others have addressed it, strictly speaking from Sapen's view the answer could more accurately be a qualified "yes" as he does state all beings have a basic "inherent" buddha-nature, | |PosAllBuddhaNote=There is some discrepancy between Sapen's use of the term tathagata-essence and buddha-nature and other thinkers that use these terms synonymously. In Sapen's view, sentient beings do not possess the former, but do possess a more general form of the latter. So while the answer is a qualified "no" in terms of the more general debate on this issue and the way others have addressed it and asserted Sapan's position, strictly speaking from Sapen's view the answer could more accurately be a qualified "yes" as he does state all beings have a basic "inherent" buddha-nature, though this does not correspond to an essence that is endowed with enlightened qualities. The tricky issue being the equivalency of these terms tathagata-essence and buddha-nature. | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=*"In verses 59-63 of Sapen's Distinguishing the Three Vows, he argues against the presentation of the existence of a tathâgata-essence or sugata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities in sentient beings. Sapen demonstrates that such a position would be tantamount to holding the view of the Sämkhya School, that the "result is present in its cause." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=*"In verses 59-63 of Sapen's Distinguishing the Three Vows, he argues against the presentation of the existence of a tathâgata-essence or sugata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities in sentient beings. Sapen demonstrates that such a position would be tantamount to holding the view of the Sämkhya School, that the "result is present in its cause." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 27. | ||
*"It is evident from Distinguishing the Three Vows that the tathâgataessence endowed with enlightened qualities does not exist in sentient beings. But does that mean that Sapen completely rejects the existence of tathägata-essence in sentient beings?" [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], pp. 27-28. | *"It is evident from Distinguishing the Three Vows that the tathâgataessence endowed with enlightened qualities does not exist in sentient beings. But does that mean that Sapen completely rejects the existence of tathägata-essence in sentient beings?" [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], pp. 27-28. |
Revision as of 10:10, 19 March 2018
PersonType | Category:Author |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Sakya Paṇḍita |
MainNameTib | ས་སྐྱ་པཎྜི་ཏ་ |
MainNameWylie | sa skya paN+Di ta |
AltNamesTib | ཀུན་དགའ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་ · ས་སྐྱ་པཎྜི་ཏ་ཀུན་དགའ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་ |
AltNamesWylie | kun dga' rgyal mtshan · sa skya paN+Di ta kun dga' rgyal mtshan |
AltNamesOther | Sapaṇ |
YearBirth | 1182 |
YearDeath | 1251 |
TibDateGender | Male |
TibDateElement | Water |
TibDateAnimal | Tiger |
TibDateRabjung | 3 |
ReligiousAffiliation | Sakya |
PersonalAffiliation | Grandson of Sachen Kunga Nyingpo and nephew of rje btsun grags pa rgyal mtshan and bsod nams rtse mo, and uncle of chos rgyal 'phags pa. |
StudentOf | Kha che paN chen shAkya shrI · rje btsun grags pa rgyal mtshan |
TeacherOf | gu ru chos kyi dbang phyug · chos rgyal 'phags pa · yang dgon pa rgyal mtshan dpal |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P1056 |
Treasury of Lives | http://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Sakya-Pan%E1%B8%8Dita-Kunga-Gyeltsen/2137 |
Himalayan Art Resources | https://www.himalayanart.org/search/set.cfm?setID=325 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
PosBuNayDefProv | Provisional |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes |
|
PosAllBuddha | Qualified No |
PosAllBuddhaNote | There is some discrepancy between Sapen's use of the term tathagata-essence and buddha-nature and other thinkers that use these terms synonymously. In Sapen's view, sentient beings do not possess the former, but do possess a more general form of the latter. So while the answer is a qualified "no" in terms of the more general debate on this issue and the way others have addressed it and asserted Sapan's position, strictly speaking from Sapen's view the answer could more accurately be a qualified "yes" as he does state all beings have a basic "inherent" buddha-nature, though this does not correspond to an essence that is endowed with enlightened qualities. The tricky issue being the equivalency of these terms tathagata-essence and buddha-nature. |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes |
|
PosYogaMadhya | Madhyamaka |
PosZhenRang | Rangtong |
PosZhenRangNotes | predates the distinction but is clearly in line with rangtong |
PosAnalyticMedit | Analytic Tradition |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | "An opinion shared by rNgog and Sapan is that Buddha-nature should be understood in the sense of emptiness. The difference is that rNgog directly equates Buddha-nature with emptiness, whereas Sa-pan regards the intentional ground (dgongs gzhi) of Buddha-nature to be emptiness." Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, pp. 309-310. |
PosSvataPrasa | Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་) |
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.