Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen: Difference between revisions

From Tsadra Commons
Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Person
{{Person
|MainNamePhon=Gyaltsap Je Dharma Rinchen
|SortName=Gyaltsap Dharma Rinchen
|MainNameTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་
|MainNameWylie=rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors
|images=File:Gyaltsab je.jpg
|yearbirth=1364
|yeardeath=1432
|bornin=myang stod ri nang (gtsang)
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P65
|TolLink=https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Gyeltsab-Darma-Rinchen/9095
|tolExcerpt=Gyaltsap Je Darma Rinchen was one of the chief disciples of Tsongkhapa. He was a prolific writer, composing on Madhyamaka and tantric topics, most famously a commentary on the Bodhicaryāvatāra. He served as the second abbot of Ganden Monastery, following the death of Tsongkhapa in 1419, and occupied the position, known as the Ganden Tripa, until the year before his own death.
|pagename=Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
|HasDrlPage=Yes
|HasDrlPage=Yes
|HasLibPage=Yes
|HasLibPage=Yes
Line 6: Line 18:
|HasDnzPage=No
|HasDnzPage=No
|HasBnwPage=Yes
|HasBnwPage=Yes
|MainNameWylie=rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
|MainNameTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་
|AltNamesWylie=rgyal tshab rje; dga' ldan khri pa 02
|AltNamesWylie=rgyal tshab rje; dga' ldan khri pa 02
|AltNamesTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་; དགའ་ལྡན་ཁྲི་པ་༠༢་
|AltNamesTib=རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་; དགའ་ལྡན་ཁྲི་པ་༠༢་
|AltNamesOther=Ganden Tripa, 2nd;
|AltNamesOther=Ganden Tripa, 2nd;
|YearBirth=1364
|YearDeath=1432
|BornIn=myang stod ri nang (gtsang)
|TibDateGender=Male
|TibDateGender=Male
|TibDateElement=Wood
|TibDateElement=Wood
|TibDateAnimal=Dragon
|TibDateAnimal=Dragon
|TibDateRabjung=6
|TibDateRabjung=6
|ReligiousAffiliation=dge lugs
|ReligiousAffiliation=Geluk
|StudentOf=Tsong kha pa; Red mda' ba gzhon nu blo gros;
|StudentOf=Tsong kha pa; Red mda' ba gzhon nu blo gros;
|TeacherOf='jam dbyangs chos rje bkra shis dpal ldan; Dalai Lama, 1st; mkhas grub rje; 'dul 'dzin grags pa rgyal mtshan
|TeacherOf='jam dbyangs chos rje bkra shis dpal ldan; Dalai Lama, 1st; mkhas grub rje; 'dul 'dzin grags pa rgyal mtshan
|BiographicalInfo=Alternative birth date 1362.
|BiographicalInfo=Alternative birth date 1362.
*one of the two chief disciples of tsong kha pa and his first successor on the see of dga' ldan, 1419-1431.
*one of the two chief disciples of tsong kha pa and his first successor on the seat of dga' ldan, 1419-1431.
:dga' ldan dgon pa dang brag yer pa'i lo rgyus (p. 58)  
:dga' ldan dgon pa dang brag yer pa'i lo rgyus (p. 58)  


Line 34: Line 41:
:1419: came to the throne of dga' ldan and served ll years.
:1419: came to the throne of dga' ldan and served ll years.
:gsung 'bum in 8 volumes.
:gsung 'bum in 8 volumes.
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P65
|TolLink=https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Gyeltsab-Darma-Rinchen/9095
|images=File:Gyaltsab je.jpg
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes="So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakävatära and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 107.
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes="So, Gyeltsap claims that both the ''Madhyamakāvatāra'' and the ''Uttaratantra'' explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 107.
|PosAllBuddha=Qualified Yes
|PosAllBuddha=Qualified Yes
|PosAllBuddhaNote="Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathägata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathägata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood."
|PosAllBuddhaNote="Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathāgata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathāgata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood."
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 99.
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 99.
|PosWheelTurn=Second Turning
|PosWheelTurn=Second Turning
|PosWheelTurnNotes="So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakävatära and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 107.
|PosWheelTurnNotes="So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakāvatāra and the ''Uttaratantra'' explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 107.
* However, this is a tricky issue and elsewhere Wangchuk states, "For Gyeltsap, there is no contradiction in saying that the Uttaratantra comments on both last-wheel sutras and the middle-wheel sutras." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 102.
* However, this is a tricky issue and elsewhere Wangchuk states, "For Gyeltsap, there is no contradiction in saying that the ''Uttaratantra'' comments on both last-wheel sutras and the middle-wheel sutras." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 102.
|PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka
|PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes="In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamätra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Präsangika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 98.
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes=*"In his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's ''Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka''. He criticizes those who propose that the ''Uttaratantra'' is a Cittamātra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 98.
*"Gyeltsap says, "It is not to be asserted that Ācārya Asaṅga is described as a proponent of Vijñāptimātratā; otherwise it would completely contradict his detailed explanation of the one final vehicle and the presentation of subtle emptiness in his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary." Gyeltsap argues that the emptiness explained in the ''Uttaratantra'' and its commentary by Asaṅga is subtle emptiness, and it does not differ from the emptiness that is delineated in the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 100.
|PosZhenRang=Rangtong
|PosZhenRang=Rangtong
|PosVehicles=1
|PosVehicles=1
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
|PosVehiclesNotes="Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathāgata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathāgata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 99.
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="In brief, Gyeltsap argues that buddha-nature, or tathägataessence, does not refer to a fully enlightened entity covered by adventitious defilements. Rather it is the same as the emptiness of inherent existence that is explicated in texts such as the Prajnäpäramitäsütras and Madhyamakävatära." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 106.
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities)
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="In brief, Gyeltsap argues that buddha-nature, or tathāgata-essence, does not refer to a fully enlightened entity covered by adventitious defilements. Rather it is the same as the emptiness of inherent existence that is explicated in texts such as the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' and ''Madhyamakāvatāra''." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 106.
|IsInGyatsa=No
|PosSvataPrasa=Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
|PosSvataPrasa=Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
|PosSvataPrasaNotes="In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gveltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamätra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Präsangika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 98.
|PosSvataPrasaNotes=*"In his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's ''Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka''. He criticizes those who propose that the ''Uttaratantra'' is a Cittamātra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 98.
|IsInGyatsa=No
*"In arguing that the emptiness expounded in the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' and the tathāgata-essence explicated in the ''Uttaratantra'' are the same, Gyeltsap accords the status to the ''Uttaratantra'' equal to that of Nāgārjuna's ''Mūlamadhyamakakārikā'', Candrakīrti's ''Madhyamakāvatāra'', and other Madhyamaka treatises which present the ultimate view of Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 100.
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:24, 12 May 2022

Gyaltsab je.jpg
PersonType Category:Classical Tibetan Authors
MainNamePhon Gyaltsap Je Dharma Rinchen
MainNameTib རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་དར་མ་རིན་ཆེན་
MainNameWylie rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen
SortName Gyaltsap Dharma Rinchen
AltNamesTib རྒྱལ་ཚབ་རྗེ་  ·  དགའ་ལྡན་ཁྲི་པ་༠༢་
AltNamesWylie rgyal tshab rje  ·  dga' ldan khri pa 02
AltNamesOther Ganden Tripa, 2nd
BiographicalInfo Alternative birth date 1362.
  • one of the two chief disciples of tsong kha pa and his first successor on the seat of dga' ldan, 1419-1431.
dga' ldan dgon pa dang brag yer pa'i lo rgyus (p. 58)
  • birth 1364 at ri nang (nyang stod)
  • Assumes Office 1419 Dga' ldan khri at dga' ldan dgon (stag rtse rdzong)
  • Leaves Office 1431 Dga' ldan khri at dga' ldan dgon (stag rtse rdzong)
  • death 1432
  • Took the degree of dka' bcu pa at sa skya, gsang phu, and rtsed thang.
debated against rong ston and against g.yag phrug pa.
1419: came to the throne of dga' ldan and served ll years.
gsung 'bum in 8 volumes.
YearBirth 1364
YearDeath 1432
BornIn myang stod ri nang (gtsang)
TibDateGender Male
TibDateElement Wood
TibDateAnimal Dragon
TibDateRabjung 6
ReligiousAffiliation Geluk
StudentOf Tsongkhapa  ·  Rendawa Zhönu Lodrö
TeacherOf Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden  ·  Gendün Drup  ·  mkhas grub rje  ·  'dul 'dzin grags pa rgyal mtshan
BDRC https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P65
Treasury of Lives https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Gyeltsab-Darma-Rinchen/9095
IsInGyatsa No
PosBuNayDefProv Definitive
PosBuNayDefProvNotes "So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakāvatāra and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 107.
PosAllBuddha Qualified Yes
PosAllBuddhaNote "Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathāgata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathāgata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood."
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 99.
PosWheelTurn Second Turning
PosWheelTurnNotes "So, Gyeltsap claims that both the Madhyamakāvatāra and the Uttaratantra explain the same meaning of ultimate truth. Hence, they are both definitive works that explicate the intention of the middle wheel." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 107.
PosYogaMadhya Madhyamaka
PosYogaMadhyaNotes
  • "In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamātra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 98.
  • "Gyeltsap says, "It is not to be asserted that Ācārya Asaṅga is described as a proponent of Vijñāptimātratā; otherwise it would completely contradict his detailed explanation of the one final vehicle and the presentation of subtle emptiness in his Uttaratantra commentary." Gyeltsap argues that the emptiness explained in the Uttaratantra and its commentary by Asaṅga is subtle emptiness, and it does not differ from the emptiness that is delineated in the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 100.
PosZhenRang Rangtong
PosVehicles 1
PosVehiclesNotes "Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathāgata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathāgata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 99.
PosEmptyLumin Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities)
PosEmptyLuminNotes "In brief, Gyeltsap argues that buddha-nature, or tathāgata-essence, does not refer to a fully enlightened entity covered by adventitious defilements. Rather it is the same as the emptiness of inherent existence that is explicated in texts such as the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras and Madhyamakāvatāra." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 106.
PosSvataPrasa Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
PosSvataPrasaNotes
  • "In his Uttaratantra commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka. He criticizes those who propose that the Uttaratantra is a Cittamātra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 98.
  • "In arguing that the emptiness expounded in the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras and the tathāgata-essence explicated in the Uttaratantra are the same, Gyeltsap accords the status to the Uttaratantra equal to that of Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Candrakīrti's Madhyamakāvatāra, and other Madhyamaka treatises which present the ultimate view of Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 100.
Other wikis

If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag {{PersonCall}} inside the destination page. But please first make sure you are on the right page. Some wikis have the person page on Person/<COMMONS PERSON PAGENAME>, in which case the page <COMMONS PERSON PAGENAME> needs to be redirected. Ask if you need clarification.