Dol po pa: Difference between revisions

From Tsadra Commons
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
|PosZhenRang=Zhentong
|PosZhenRang=Zhentong
|PosZhenRangNotes=He was not the first to use the term, but he was the one to define and make it a central feature of his innovative philosophical position:
|PosZhenRangNotes=He was not the first to use the term, but he was the one to define and make it a central feature of his innovative philosophical position:
*"According to traditional Tibetan accounts, the revolutionary theory that the ultimate is not "empty of an own-being” (''rang stong'') but “empty of other” (''gzhan stong'') arose in Dölpopas mind during a Kālacakra retreat at Jonang. Lhai Gyaltsen informs us that Dölpopas realization was connected with the Kãlacakratantra and the construction of the great stüpa in Jonang, which was consecrated in 1333. One of the first works in which Dölpopa expressed his new zhentong understanding of the Buddhist doctrine was his famous Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho. His last major work was the Bka bsdu bzhi pa (Bka' bsdu bzhi pa'i don bstan rtsis chen po), The Great Reckoning of the Doctrine That Has the Significance of a Fourth Council), which can be seen as a final summary of Dölpopas views." [[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 75.
*"According to traditional Tibetan accounts, the revolutionary theory that the ultimate is not "empty of an own-being” (''rang stong'') but “empty of other” (''gzhan stong'') arose in Dölpopas mind during a Kālacakra retreat at Jonang. Lhai Gyaltsen informs us that Dölpopas realization was connected with the ''Kālacakratantra'' and the construction of the great ''stūpa'' in Jonang, which was consecrated in 1333. One of the first works in which Dölpopa expressed his new zhentong understanding of the Buddhist doctrine was his famous ''Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho''. His last major work was the ''Bka bsdu bzhi pa'' (''Bka' bsdu bzhi pa'i don bstan rtsis chen po'', ''The Great Reckoning of the Doctrine That Has the Significance of a Fourth Council''), which can be seen as a final summary of Dölpopas views." [[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 75.
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities)
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities)
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="He typically describes both buddha nature and the dharmakāya as being ultimately really established, everlasting, eternal, permanent, immutable (''ther zug''), and being beyond dependent origination. He also equates the tathāgata heart with “ālaya-wisdom” as opposed to the ālaya-consciousness." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 68.
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="He typically describes both buddha nature and the dharmakāya as being ultimately really established, everlasting, eternal, permanent, immutable (''ther zug''), and being beyond dependent origination. He also equates the tathāgata heart with “ālaya-wisdom” as opposed to the ālaya-consciousness." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 68.

Revision as of 11:25, 27 November 2019

Himalayan Art Resources
PersonType Category:Classical Tibetan Authors
MainNamePhon Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen
MainNameTib དོལ་པོ་པ་ཤེས་རབ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་
MainNameWylie dol po pa shes rab rgyal mtshan
AltNamesTib ཤེས་རབ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་  ·  ཤེས་རབ་མགོན་  ·  རྟོན་པ་བཞི་ལྡན་
AltNamesWylie shes rab rgyal mtshan  ·  shes rab mgon  ·  rton pa bzhi ldan
YearBirth 1292
YearDeath 1361
BornIn gtsang stod mnga' ris dol po gru gsum spu mdo
TibDateGender Male
TibDateElement Water
TibDateAnimal Dragon
TibDateRabjung 5
ReligiousAffiliation Jonang
StudentOf tshul khrims snying po  ·  skyi ston 'jam dbyangs  ·  skyi ston grags pa rgyal mtshan  ·  sa skya slob dpon shes rab bzang po  ·  gzhon nu bzang po  ·  blo gros bstan pa  ·  jo gdan mkhan po bsod nams grags pa  ·  nag 'bum  ·  jo nang chos rje yon gtan rgya mtsho
TeacherOf jo nang lo tsA ba blo gros dpal  ·  g.yag sde paN chen  ·  bsod nams rgyal mtshan  ·  phyogs las rnam rgyal  ·  sa bzang ma ti paN chen blo gros rgyal mtshan  ·  'bri gung lo tsA ba ma Ni ka shrI  ·  nya dbon kun dga' dpal  ·  kun spangs chos grags dpal bzang
BDRC https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P139
Treasury of Lives https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Dolpopa-Sherab-Gyeltsen/2670
Himalayan Art Resources https://www.himalayanart.org/search/set.cfm?setID=1595
IsInGyatsa No
BnwShortPersonBio Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen was one of the most influential Buddhist masters in Tibetan history. He first became an important scholar of the Sakya tradition, but then moved to Jonang Monastery. There he became the fourth holder of the monastic seat and constructed a monumental stupa. Dölpopa’s ideas, specifically his famous formulation of the zhentong view and his interpretations of Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna doctrine, have elicited controversy for nearly seven hundred years.
PosBuNayDefProv Definitive
PosBuNayDefProvNotes "For Dölpopa, the teaching on buddha nature is of definitive meaning and serves as one of the cornerstones of his Shentong view. He typically describes both buddha nature and the dharmakāya as being ultimately really established, everlasting, eternal, permanent, immutable (ther zug), and being beyond dependent origination." Brunnhölzl, K., When the Clouds Part, p. 68.
PosAllBuddha Yes
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes "The crucial stanza [RGV] I.27, in which the three reasons for the presence of a buddha nature in sentient beings are presented, is thus explained in the following way:

Since the dharmakāya of the perfect buddha embraces and pervades all phenomena, since there is no differentiation [to be made] within the dharmatā concerning all samsāra and nirvāna, and since the potential of the tathāgata exists in all sentient beings as the natural purity of the dharmadhātu, which can be purified of hindrances, truly every being possesses, always, continuously, and throughout beginningless time, the ultimate essence of the Buddha." Mathes, K., A Direct Path to the Buddha Within, p. 82.

PosWheelTurn Third Turning
PosYogaMadhyaNotes Dolpopa has a unique view on this issue as Wangchuk points out:
  • "Dölpopa argues the following: (1) Cittamātra is categorized into Conventional Cittamātra (kun rdzob pa'i sems tsam) and Ultimate Cittamātra (don dam pa'i sems tsam); (2) Cittamātra must not be conflated with Vijnānavāda; (3) Madhyamaka is grouped into Madyamaka without Appearance (snang med dbu ma) and Madhyamaka with Appearance (snang bcas dbu ma). His Mahäyäna doxography differs significantly from that of other fourteenth-century Tibetan scholars." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 47.
  • It seems that the simple answer is that Dolpopa espoused Great Madhyamaka (dbu ma chen mo) or Madhyamaka with Appearance (snang bcas dbu ma), which is equivalent to Ultimate Cittamātra (don dam pa'i sems tsam). See Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, pp. 49-50.
PosZhenRang Zhentong
PosZhenRangNotes He was not the first to use the term, but he was the one to define and make it a central feature of his innovative philosophical position:
  • "According to traditional Tibetan accounts, the revolutionary theory that the ultimate is not "empty of an own-being” (rang stong) but “empty of other” (gzhan stong) arose in Dölpopas mind during a Kālacakra retreat at Jonang. Lhai Gyaltsen informs us that Dölpopas realization was connected with the Kālacakratantra and the construction of the great stūpa in Jonang, which was consecrated in 1333. One of the first works in which Dölpopa expressed his new zhentong understanding of the Buddhist doctrine was his famous Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho. His last major work was the Bka bsdu bzhi pa (Bka' bsdu bzhi pa'i don bstan rtsis chen po, The Great Reckoning of the Doctrine That Has the Significance of a Fourth Council), which can be seen as a final summary of Dölpopas views." Mathes, K., A Direct Path to the Buddha Within, p. 75.
PosEmptyLumin Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities)
PosEmptyLuminNotes "He typically describes both buddha nature and the dharmakāya as being ultimately really established, everlasting, eternal, permanent, immutable (ther zug), and being beyond dependent origination. He also equates the tathāgata heart with “ālaya-wisdom” as opposed to the ālaya-consciousness." Brunnhölzl, K., When the Clouds Part, p. 68.
Other wikis