Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Tsering Wangchuk p. 14. | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Tsering Wangchuk p. 14. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Qualified Yes | |PosAllBuddha=Qualified Yes | ||
|PosAllBuddhaNote="...both Ngok and Chapa argue that sentient beings do not have tathägata-essence on the basis of the first reason because they do not have the purified enlightened body of a buddha, rather they have thepotential to achieve an enlightened state. | |PosAllBuddhaNote="...both Ngok and Chapa argue that sentient beings do not have tathägata-essence on the basis of the first reason because they do not have the purified enlightened body of a buddha, rather they have thepotential to achieve an enlightened state. However, they agree that sentient beings have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of the second reason, which is that such-ness is indivisible or nondual. As Ngok states, 'That both a tathägata and ordinary beings have [tathägata] essence is actually the case.' The first reason is true only for enlightened beings, but only designated for ordinary beings; the second reason applies to both enlightened beings and sentient beings. Therefore, the two Kadam masters argue that sentient beings do not have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of either the first reason of the resultant essence or the third reason of the causal essence. Rather it is the second reason that becomes the central point | ||
However, they agree that sentient beings have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of the second reason, which is that such-ness is indivisible or nondual. As Ngok states, 'That both a tathägata | for establishing the link between enlightenment and sentient beings. It is the middle reason that shows that sentient beings and tathâgatas are the same in their ultimate nature. In other words, the only thing that sentient beings have in common with enlightened beings is the ultimate nature of their minds." | ||
and ordinary beings have [tathägata] essence is actually the case.' The first reason is true only for enlightened beings, but only designated for ordinary beings; the second reason applies to both enlightened beings and sentient beings. | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], pp. 17-18. | ||
Therefore, the two Kadam masters argue that sentient beings do not have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of either the first reason of the resultant essence or the third reason of the causal essence. Rather it is the second reason that becomes the central point | |||
for establishing the link between enlightenment and sentient beings. It is the middle reason that shows that sentient beings and tathâgatas are the same in their ultimate nature. In other words, the only thing that sentient beings have in common with enlightened beings is the | |||
ultimate nature of their minds." | |||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], pp. 17-18 | |||
|PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | |PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | ||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Suchness | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Suchness | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="Tathägata-essence must not be connected to either the first reason—the notion that the resultant | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="Tathägata-essence must not be connected to either the first reason—the notion that the resultant buddha-body pervades all beings—or the third reason which is that causal buddha-nature exists in all beings. Therefore, tathägata-essence is neither the resultant buddha-body nor the causal buddha-nature, rather it is the ultimate nature of suchness." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 16. | ||
buddha-body pervades all beings—or the third reason which is that causal buddha-nature exists in all beings. Therefore, tathägata-essence is neither the resultant buddha-body nor the causal buddha-nature, | |||
rather it is the ultimate nature of suchness." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 16. | |||
|PosSvataPrasa=Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) | |PosSvataPrasa=Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) | ||
|PosSvataPrasaNotes=Tsering | |PosSvataPrasaNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 14, quotes van der Kuijp. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
|PosDefProv=Definitive | |PosDefProv=Definitive | ||
|PosDefProvNotes="While Chapa shows that the Uttaratantra is definitive, he demonstrates that certain phrases in the Uttaratantra are not necessarily definitive—such as the passage teaching the buddha-element as cause. This is because for Chapa being a cause in this context entails being conditioned and conventional and something that exists only on the causal state of enlightenment, whereas the buddha-element is unconditioned and ultimate and something that exists pervasively as the ultimate nature on both the causal and resultant levels of enlightenment." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 19. | |PosDefProvNotes="While Chapa shows that the Uttaratantra is definitive, he demonstrates that certain phrases in the Uttaratantra are not necessarily definitive—such as the passage teaching the buddha-element as cause. This is because for Chapa being a cause in this context entails being conditioned and conventional and something that exists only on the causal state of enlightenment, whereas the buddha-element is unconditioned and ultimate and something that exists pervasively as the ultimate nature on both the causal and resultant levels of enlightenment." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 19. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:16, 16 March 2018
| PersonType | Category:Author |
|---|---|
| MainNamePhon | Chapa Chokyi Senge |
| MainNameTib | ཕྱྭ་པ་ཆོས་ཀྱི་སེངྒེ་ |
| MainNameWylie | phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge |
| AltNamesTib | ཆ་པ་ཆོས་ཀྱི་སེངྒེ་ · ཕྱ་པ་ཆོས་ཀྱི་སེངྒེ་ · གསང་ཕུ་ནེའུ་ཐོག་མཁན་རབས་༠༦་ |
| AltNamesWylie | cha pa chos kyi seng+ge · phya pa chos kyi seng+ge · gsang phu ne'u thog mkhan rabs 06 |
| BiographicalInfo | From shAkya mchog ldan a more detailed description of important students:
དཔེ་འགྲེམས་ཀྱི་གྲྭ་པ་ལྔ་སྟོང་ཙམ་བྱུང་བར་གྲགས། དེའི་ནང་ནས་མཆོག་ཏུ་གྱུར་པ། གྲུབ་ཐོབ་མི་གསུམ། ཇོ་སྲས་མི་བཞི། ཤེས་རབ་ཅན་མི་གསུམ། སེང་ཆེན་བརྒྱད ་རྣམས་སོ། །དང་པོ་ནི། རྗེ་དུས་གསུམ་མཁྱེན་པ། ཕག་མོ་གྲུབ་པ། གསལ་སྟོ་ཤོ་སྒོམ་རྣམས་སོ། །ལ་ལ་ཞང་འཚལ་པ་ཡིན་ཞེས་ཟེར། གཉིས་པ་ནི། ས་ཇོ་སྲས་བསོད་ནམས་རྩེ་མོ། མཉོས་ཇོ་སྲས་དཔལ་ལེ། ཁུ་ཇོ་སྲས་ནེ་ཙོ། རྔོག་ཇོ་སྲས་ར་མོ་རྣམས་སོ། །གསུམ་པ་ནི། རྐོང་པོ་འཇག་ཆུང༌། ལྷོ་པ་སྒོག་གཟན། པར་བུ་བ་བློ་གྲོས་སེང་གེ་རྣམས་སོ། །སྒོག་གཟན་ནི་ལྷོ་པ་ཐམས་ཅད་མཁྱེན་པར་གྲགས་པ་སྟེ། ལྷོ་པ་དྷར་སེང་ངོ༌། །བཞི་པ་ནི། ཕྱྭ་པའི་རྗེས་སུ་གདན་ས་ལོ་ལྔ་མཛད་པའི་བརྩེགས་དབང་ཕྱུག་སེང་གེ་གཙང་ནག་པ་བརྩོན་འགྲུས་སེང་གེ་ རྨ་བྱ་རྩོད་པའི་སེང་གེ་ བྲུ་ཤ་བསོད་ནམས་སེང་གེ་ མྱང་བྲན་པ་ཆོས་ཀྱི་སེང་གེ་ དན་འབག་པ་སྨྲ་བའི་སེང་གེ་ འདམ་པ་དཀོན་མཆོག་སེང་གེ་ རྐྱང་དུར་བ་གཞོན་ནུ་སེང་གེ་ ལ་ལ་དག་འུ་ཡུག་པ་བསོད་ནམས་སེང་གེ ཞེས་ཟེར་ཡང་དུས་མི་འགྲིག་ Another list of the seng chen rgyad can be found in the Chos 'byung mkhas pa'i dga' ston, p. 729: སློབ་མ་ཐུགས་སྲས་སེང་ཆེན་བརྒྱད་ཅེས། གཙང་ནག་པ་བརྩོན་འགྲུས་སེང་གེ དན་འབག་སྨྲ་བའི་སེང་གེ བྲུ་ཤ་བསོད་ནམས་སེང་གེ རྨ་བྱ་རྩོད་པའི་སེང་གེ རྩགས་དབང་ཕྱུག་སེང་གེ ཉང་བྲན་ཆོས་ཀྱི་སེང་གེ འདན་མ་དཀོན་མཆོག་སེང་གེ གཉལ་པ་ཡོན་ཏན་སེང་གེ ཁ་ཅིག་གཙང་པ་འཇམ་དཔལ་སེང་གེ་ཡང་འདྲེན། And again in the Chos rnam kun btus, p. 1853: 1. gtsang nag pa brtson 'grus seng ge 2. dan 'bag pa smra ba'i seng ge 3. bru sha bsod nams seng ge 4. rmya ba rtsod pa'i seng ge 5. rtsags dbang phyug seng ge 6. myang bran chos kyi seng ge 7. ldan ma dkon mchog seng ge 8. gnyal pa yon tan seng ge |
| YearBirth | 1109 |
| YearDeath | 1169 |
| BornIn | phywa yul (stag rtse khul) |
| TibDateGender | Female |
| TibDateElement | Earth |
| TibDateAnimal | Ox |
| TibDateRabjung | 2 |
| ReligiousAffiliation | bka' gdams |
| StudentOf | gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas · byang chub grags · zhang tshe spong chos kyi bla ma |
| TeacherOf | First Karmapa Dusum Khyenpa · phag mo gru pa rdo rje rgyal po · bsod nams rtse mo · rma bya byang chub brtson 'grus · gtsang nag pa brtson 'grus seng+ge · 'jad pa slob dpon ston skyabs · slob dpon gtsang pa 'jam seng · nyang bran pa chos kyi ye shes · ldan ma dkon mchog seng+ge · dan 'bag pa smra ba'i seng ge |
| BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P1404 |
| Treasury of Lives | https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Chapa-Chokyi-Sengge/TBRC_P1404 |
| IsInGyatsa | No |
| PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
| PosBuNayDefProvNotes | Tsering Wangchuk p. 14. |
| PosAllBuddha | Qualified Yes |
| PosAllBuddhaNote | "...both Ngok and Chapa argue that sentient beings do not have tathägata-essence on the basis of the first reason because they do not have the purified enlightened body of a buddha, rather they have thepotential to achieve an enlightened state. However, they agree that sentient beings have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of the second reason, which is that such-ness is indivisible or nondual. As Ngok states, 'That both a tathägata and ordinary beings have [tathägata] essence is actually the case.' The first reason is true only for enlightened beings, but only designated for ordinary beings; the second reason applies to both enlightened beings and sentient beings. Therefore, the two Kadam masters argue that sentient beings do not have the tathägata-essence from the perspective of either the first reason of the resultant essence or the third reason of the causal essence. Rather it is the second reason that becomes the central point
for establishing the link between enlightenment and sentient beings. It is the middle reason that shows that sentient beings and tathâgatas are the same in their ultimate nature. In other words, the only thing that sentient beings have in common with enlightened beings is the ultimate nature of their minds." |
| PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, pp. 17-18. |
| PosWheelTurn | Third Turning |
| PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as Suchness |
| PosEmptyLuminNotes | "Tathägata-essence must not be connected to either the first reason—the notion that the resultant buddha-body pervades all beings—or the third reason which is that causal buddha-nature exists in all beings. Therefore, tathägata-essence is neither the resultant buddha-body nor the causal buddha-nature, rather it is the ultimate nature of suchness." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 16. |
| PosSvataPrasa | Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) |
| PosSvataPrasaNotes | Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 14, quotes van der Kuijp. |
| Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as Suchness" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.