Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Jayānanda  + (Though he was a follower of Madhyamaka, he likely equates the buddha-nature teachings with Yogācāra, as he deems both to be provisional.)

• Mkhas grub rje  + ("However, Khedrup, a student and a junior … "However, Khedrup, a student and a junior contemporary of Rendawa, mentions in his ''Presentation of the General Tantric Systems'' (''rgyud sde spyi rnam''), "Lama Jé [that is, Rendawa] asserts that [the ''Uttaratantra''] is a commentarial work on last-wheel teachings, explicating the view of the Cittamātra School." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 88.The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 88.)
• Red mda' ba gzhon nu blo gros  + ( *"As for whether the ''Uttaratantra'' is … </br>*"As for whether the ''Uttaratantra'' is definitive or provisional, Rendawa does not explicitly identify it either as definitive or provisional in the texts that I have consulted. However, Khedrup, a student and a junior contemporary of Rendawa, mentions in his ''Presentation of the General Tantric Systems'' (''rgyud sde spyi rnam''), "Lama Jé [that is, Rendawa] asserts that the ''Uttaratantra'' is a commentarial work on last-wheel teachings, explicating the view of the Cittamātra School." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 88.</br>*Though Rendawa's personal view is explained by Wangchuk as, "Rendawa argues that only Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka system presents the correct ultimate view, not Asanga's Cittamātra School." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 87.</br>*However there is a possibility that he had a change of heart later in life, as Wangchuk sites the ''Blue Annals'' as stating, "The Venerable Red-mda'-pa believed at first the ''Uttaratantra'' to be a Vijñānamātra work, and even composed a commentary from the standpoint of the followers of the Vijñānamātra school. Later, when he became a hermit, he used to sing: "It is impossible to differentiate between the presence and absence of this our Mind. The Buddha having perceived that it penetrated all living beings, as in the example of a subterranean treasure, or the womb of a pregnant woman, had proclaimed all living beings to be possessed of the Essence of the Sugata." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 88.</br>atantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 88. )
• Rgyal tshab rje dar ma rin chen  + ( *"In his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary, Gye … </br>*"In his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary, Gyeltsap shows the strong influence of Tsongkhapa's ''Illuminating the Thoughts of the Madhyamaka''. He criticizes those who propose that the ''Uttaratantra'' is a Cittamātra text, arguing that it explicates the ultimate truth presented in the Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 98.</br>*"Gyeltsap says, "It is not to be asserted that Ācārya Asaṅga is described as a proponent of Vijñāptimātratā; otherwise it would completely contradict his detailed explanation of the one final vehicle and the presentation of subtle emptiness in his ''Uttaratantra'' commentary." Gyeltsap argues that the emptiness explained in the ''Uttaratantra'' and its commentary by Asaṅga is subtle emptiness, and it does not differ from the emptiness that is delineated in the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 100.</br>in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 100. )
• Dol po pa  + (Dolpopa has a unique view on this issue as … Dolpopa has a unique view on this issue as Wangchuk points out:</br>*"Dölpopa argues the following: (1) Cittamātra is categorized into Conventional Cittamātra (''kun rdzob pa'i sems tsam'') and Ultimate Cittamātra (''don dam pa'i sems tsam''); (2) Cittamātra must not be conflated with Vijnānavāda; (3) Madhyamaka is grouped into Madyamaka without Appearance (''snang med dbu ma'') and Madhyamaka with Appearance (''snang bcas dbu ma''). His Mahäyäna doxography differs significantly from that of other fourteenth-century Tibetan scholars." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 47.</br></br>*It seems that the simple answer is that Dolpopa espoused Great Madhyamaka (''dbu ma chen mo'') or Madhyamaka with Appearance (''snang bcas dbu ma''), which is equivalent to Ultimate Cittamātra (''don dam pa'i sems tsam''). See [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', pp. 49-50.ratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', pp. 49-50.)
• Btsan kha bo che  + (Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ng … Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (''bshad pa’i bka’ babs'') and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (''sgrub pa’i bka’ babs''), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124.ouds Part]]'', p. 124.)
• Rta nag rin chen ye shes  + (Though this is perhaps up for debate, he c … Though this is perhaps up for debate, he certainly sides with the works of Maitreya and the last wheel sūtras over those of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' and the associated Madhyamaka works, which he labels as a "nihilistic emptiness (''chad pa'i stong pa nyid''). See [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 36.Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 36.)
• Gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med  + ("Nevertheless, even though the ''Uttaratan … "Nevertheless, even though the ''Uttaratantra'' and the sutras on which the ''Uttaratantra'' is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'', Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the ''Uttaratantra'' teach emptiness. He argues:</br>'The sutras for the ''Uttaratantra'' and the ''Uttaratantra'' [itself] do not contradict the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' because the emptiness of inherent existence of all phenomena taught there [in the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''] is the dharma-body explicated here [in the last wheel sutras and the ''Uttaratantra''].'" [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 33.ra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 33.)