Rta nag rin chen ye shes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rta nag rin chen ye shes on the DRL
རྟ་ནག་རིན་ཆེན་ཡེ་ཤེས་
Wylie | rta nag rin chen ye shes |
---|---|
English Phonetics | Tanak Rinchen Yeshe |
Other names
- རིན་ཆེན་ཡེ་ཤེས་
- རྟ་ནག་རིན་ཡེ་
- rin chen ye shes
- rta nag rin ye
Notes on Names
There seems to be some confusion with this person and Zhang rin chen ye shes. In terms of the authorship of this work rgyud bla ma'i 'grel pa, BDRC attributes it to Zhang rin chen ye shes, while Tsering Wangchuk in The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows repeatedly associates this work with rta nag rin chen ye shes, though this assessment seems to be based, at least partially, on the research of Cyrus Stearns found in The Buddha from Dölpo.Dates
Birth: | 13th Century |
---|---|
Death: | 1345/1346 |
Notes on dates: | There are no specific dates for this figure, though the estimate of his death is based on a statement in the biography of Thogs med bzang po that he passed away shortly after they met in 1345. |
Tibetan calendar dates
About
- Religious Affiliation
- Kadam
- Teachers
- smon lam mgon
- Students
- Thogs med bzang po · Dol po pa
Other Biographical info:
Links
- Wiki Pages
Buddha Nature Project
- Person description or short bio
- "Rinchen Yeshe, an expert on the five works of Maitreya, flourished in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and was primarily a teacher of Tokme Zangpo (1295–1369). He also briefly taught Dölpopa and is mentioned in Butön’s biography as an esteemed colleague." (Adapted from When the Clouds Part, p. 308.)
Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.
Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional? | |
---|---|
Position: | Definitive |
Notes: | "Rinchen Yeshé's careful text-critical analysis is meant to demonstrate that the Uttaratantra explicates the ultimate definitive meaning of the Tathāgatagarbhasūtra, Śrīmālādevīsūtra, Laṅkāvatārasūtra, and others..." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 35. |
All beings have Buddha-nature | |
Position: | Yes |
If "Qualified", explain: | *"Rinchen Yeshé quotes from these last-wheel sutras to show that the tathāgata-essence endowed with the marks and signs of a buddha (sangs rgyas kyi mtshan dang dpe byad) naturally exists in all sentient beings."
|
Notes: | Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, pp. 35-36 |
Which Wheel Turning | |
Position: | Third Turning |
Notes: | *"He obviously contrasts the last-wheel teachings that teach ultimate definite meaning from the middle-wheel sutras such as the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras that, according to him, do not primarily teach the ultimate definitive meaning. Rather, as Rinchen Yeshé argues: 'All phenomena that are taught as empty of true existence in the middle wheel teachings, like illusions and so forth, refer [only] to conditioned conventional phenomena. The sugata-essence (bde gshegs snying po) that is explained as true and unchanging in the last wheel teachings refers to the ultimate dharma-reality, an unconditioned phenomenon.' Therefore, the middle-wheel teachings explain how conventional phenomena, such as tables, chairs, and the like, are empty of inherent existence like an illusory image. These sutras do not explicate the unconditioned ultimate truth that is primarily taught in the definitive last-wheel
sutras." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 36. |
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka | |
Position: | Yogācāra |
Notes: | Though this is perhaps up for debate, he certainly sides with the works of Maitreya and the last wheel sūtras over those of the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras and the associated Madhyamaka works, which he labels as a "nihilistic emptiness (chad pa'i stong pa nyid). See Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 36. |
Zhentong vs Rangtong | |
Position: | Zhentong |
Notes: | Technically he was more of a precursor to this view, though as an important teacher to Dölpopa, especially for the Five Treatises of Maitreya it is no wonder that the latter's view is heavily indebted to Rinchen Yeshe. See
|
Promotes how many vehicles? | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
What is Buddha-nature? | |
Position: | Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities) |
Notes: | He doesn't state this explicitly but his presentation fall within this category. For instance:
|
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་) | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Causal nature of the vajrapāda | |
Position: |