Bhāvaviveka

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bhāvaviveka on the DRL

ལེགས་ལྡན་འབྱེད་
Wylie legs ldan 'byed
Romanized Sanskrit Bhāvaviveka
English Phonetics Bhāvaviveka
Sort Name Bhāvaviveka
Chinese Transliteration Qingbian
Japanese Transliteration Shöben
Korean Transliteration Ch’ǒngbyǒn
Acarya Bhavaviveka PhiladelphiaMuseumofArt2.jpg
Other names
  • ལེགས་ལྡན་
  • སྐལ་ལྡན་
  • legs ldan
  • skal ldan
Alternate names
  • Bhāviveka
  • Bhavya
Dates
Birth:   500
Death:   578


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Religious Affiliation
Svātantrika Madhyamaka
Teachers
Klu grub
Students
Dpal sbas

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P0RK301
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio
Also known as Bhāviveka and Bhavya, an important Indian master of the Madhyamaka school, identified in Tibet as a proponent of Svātantrika Madhyamaka and, within that, of Sautrāntika-Svātantrika-Madhyamaka. He is best known for two works. The first is the Prajñāpradīpa, his commentary on Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyam- akakārikā; this work has an extensive subcommentary by Avalokitavrata. Although important in its own right as one of the major commentaries on the central text of the Madhyamaka school, the work is most often mentioned for its criticism of the commentary of Buddhapālita on the first chapter of Nāgārjuna’s text, where Bhāvaviveka argues that it is insufficient for the Madhyamaka only to state the absurd consequences (prasaṅga) that follow from the position of the opponent . . . The other major work of Bhāvaviveka is his Madhyamakahṛdaya, written in verse, and its prose autocommentary, the Tarkajvālā. The Madhyamakahṛdaya is preserved in both Sanskrit and Tibetan, the Tarkajvālā only in Tibetan. It is a work of eleven chapters, the first three and the last two of which set forth the main points in Bhāvaviveka’s view of the nature of reality and the Buddhist path, dealing with such topics as bodhicitta, the knowledge of reality (tattvajñāna), and omniscience (sarvajñātā). The intervening chapters set forth the positions (and Bhāvaviveka’s refutations) of various Buddhist and non-Buddhist schools, including the śrāvaka, Yogācāra, Sāṃkhya, Vaiśeṣika, Vedānta, and Mīmāṃsā. These chapters (along with Śāntarakṣita’s Tattvasaṃgraha) are an invaluable source of insight into the relations between Madhyamaka and other contemporary Indian philosophical schools, both Buddhist and non-Buddhist. (Source: "Bhāvaviveka." In The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 114. Princeton University Press, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n41q.27.)

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position: Provisional
Notes: "Bhāviveka contends that the teaching that all sentient beings have Buddha-nature implies merely that emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness, etc., abide in the minds of all sentient beings; it does not presuppose an inherent eternal puruṣa pervading everything." Kano, K. Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 8.
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Yes
If "Qualified", explain:
Notes: See Kano, K. Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 8.
Which Wheel Turning
Position:
Notes:
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position:
Notes:
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position:
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path
Notes:
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position: