Difference between revisions of "Sgra tshad pa rin chen rnam rgyal"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|PersonType=Author" to "|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors")
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|HasDnzPage=No
 
|HasDnzPage=No
 
|HasBnwPage=Yes
 
|HasBnwPage=Yes
|PersonType=Author
+
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors
 
|MainNameWylie=sgra tshad pa rin chen rnam rgyal
 
|MainNameWylie=sgra tshad pa rin chen rnam rgyal
 
|MainNameTib=སྒྲ་ཚད་པ་རིན་ཆེན་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་
 
|MainNameTib=སྒྲ་ཚད་པ་རིན་ཆེན་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་

Revision as of 16:48, 6 April 2018

Sgra tshad pa rin chen rnam rgyal on the DRL

སྒྲ་ཚད་པ་རིན་ཆེན་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་
Wylie sgra tshad pa rin chen rnam rgyal
Other names
  • སེམས་དཔའ་ཆེན་པོ་རིན་ཆེན་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་
  • ཐུགས་སྲས་ལོ་ཙཱ་བ་རིན་ཆེན་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་
  • ཞྭ་ལུ་མཁན་ཆེན་༠༡་
  • sems dpa' chen po rin chen rnam rgyal
  • thugs sras lo tsA ba rin chen rnam rgyal
  • zhwa lu mkhan chen 01
Alternate names
  • Zhalu Khenchen, 1st
Dates
Birth:   1318
Death:   1388


Tibetan calendar dates

Dates of birth
Day
Month
Gender Male
Element Earth
Animal Horse
Rab Jyung 5
About
Religious Affiliation
bka' gdams; sa skya
Teachers
Bu ston rin chen grub
Students
'jam dbyangs grags pa rgyal mtshan · Tsong kha pa · sa bzang 'phags pa gzhon nu blo gros

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P154
Treasury of Lives Link
https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Rinchen-Namgyel/TBRC_P154
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position: Provisional
Notes: "Bu-ston and sGra-tshad-pa make of the RGV a provisional teaching, understanding Buddha-nature as what is literally stated in the RGV." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 343.
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Qualified No
If "Qualified", explain: Only Buddhas
Notes: *"Taking the reverse position of the Gelugpas on this, both Butön and his student and commentator Dratsépa Rinchen Namgyal (1318–1388) identify the actual tathāgata heart as being solely the final fruition of buddhahood. As the latter says: The fully qualified sugata heart is the dharmakāya of a perfect buddha but never exists in the great mass of sentient beings." Brunnhölzl, K., When the Clouds Part, pp. 67-68.
Which Wheel Turning
Position: Third Turning
Notes: Both second and third, though third is higher. Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 74.
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position:
Notes:
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes: Deems zhentong as conventional truth and the lowest form of emptiness and rangtong as the ultimate truth. Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 79.
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position:
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya
Notes: *Bu-ston and his disciple sGra-tshad-pa assert that Buddha-nature should be understood only in its resultant aspect, namely as only the dharmakäya of a buddha." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 343.
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position:

"Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.