Difference between revisions of "Mi pham rgya mtsho"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|images=File:Mipham (R. Beer).jpg{{!}}Line Drawing by Robert Beer Courtesy of [http://www.tibetanart.com/ The Robert Beer Online Galleries] | |images=File:Mipham (R. Beer).jpg{{!}}Line Drawing by Robert Beer Courtesy of [http://www.tibetanart.com/ The Robert Beer Online Galleries] | ||
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | |PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | ||
− | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes="Mipam explains that the last wheel’s status as the definitive meaning does not refer to everything taught in the last wheel, but specifically concerns the teaching of Buddha-nature: ...'Although the meaning of the last wheel is praised in the sūtras and commentaries, | + | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes="Mipam explains that the last wheel’s status as the definitive meaning does not refer to everything taught in the last wheel, but specifically concerns the teaching of Buddha-nature: ...'Although the meaning of the last wheel is praised in the sūtras and commentaries, [this does] not [refer to] everything in the last wheel, but is spoken in this way concerning the definitive meaning position of demonstrating the [Buddha-]nature.' [[Duckworth, D.]], [[Mipam on Buddha-Nature]], pp. 4-5. |
− | [this does] not [refer to] everything in the last wheel, but is spoken in this way concerning the definitive meaning position of demonstrating the [Buddha-]nature.' [[Duckworth, D.]], [[Mipam on Buddha-Nature]], pp. 4-5. | ||
|PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | |PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | ||
− | |PosWheelTurnNotes=Buddha-nature is a third wheel teaching, but he holds both third and second to be of definitive meaning and integrates the two | + | |PosWheelTurnNotes=Buddha-nature is a third wheel teaching, but he holds both third and second to be of definitive meaning and integrates the two as noncontradictory in his presentation of buddha-nature as the unity of emptiness and appearance. [[Duckworth, D.]], [[Mipam on Buddha-Nature]], pp. 4-5. |
|PosEmptyLuminNotes=* "Mipam states that the basic element (Buddha-nature) is empty of adventitious defilements, yet not empty of consummate qualities. These consummate qualities are inseparable from the suchness of phenomena that is | |PosEmptyLuminNotes=* "Mipam states that the basic element (Buddha-nature) is empty of adventitious defilements, yet not empty of consummate qualities. These consummate qualities are inseparable from the suchness of phenomena that is | ||
luminous clarity and self-existing wisdom." [[Duckworth, D.]], [[Mipam on Buddha-Nature]], p. 18. | luminous clarity and self-existing wisdom." [[Duckworth, D.]], [[Mipam on Buddha-Nature]], p. 18. |
Revision as of 11:17, 12 March 2018
མི་ཕམ་རྒྱ་མཚོ་
Wylie | mi pham rgya mtsho |
---|---|
English Phonetics | Mipham Gyamtso |
Other names
- མི་ཕམ་འཇམ་དབྱངས་རྣམ་རྒྱལ་རྒྱ་མཚོ་
- འཇམ་དཔལ་དགྱེས་པའི་རྡོ་རྗེ་
- འཇུ་མི་ཕམ་
- mi pham 'jam dbyangs rnam rgyal rgya mtsho
- 'jam dpal dgyes pa'i rdo rje
- 'ju mi pham
Dates
Birth: | 1846 |
---|---|
Death: | 1912 |
Place of birth: | sde dge |
Tibetan calendar dates
Day | |
---|---|
Month | |
Gender | Male |
Element | Fire |
Animal | Horse |
Rab Jyung | 14 |
About
- Religious Affiliation
- Nyingma
- Teachers
- 'jam dbyangs mkhyen brtse'i dbang po · 'jam mgon kong sprul · Dpal sprul 'jigs med chos kyi dbang po · Lung rtogs bstan pa'i nyi ma · Rdzogs chen bzhi pa mi 'gyur nam mkha'i rdo rje
- Students
- Las rab gling pa · 'jigs med bstan pa'i nyi ma · 'gyur med pad+ma rnam rgyal · A 'dzoms 'brug pa 'gro 'dul dpa' bo rdo rje · Lung rtogs bstan pa'i nyi ma · Dil mgo mkhyen brtse bkra shis dpal 'byor · Pad+ma dbang mchog rgyal po
Other Biographical info:
Links
- BDRC Link
- https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P252
- Treasury of Lives Link
- http://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Mipam-Gyatso/4228
- Wiki Pages
Buddha Nature Project
- Person description or short bio
Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.
Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional? | |
---|---|
Position: | Definitive |
Notes: | "Mipam explains that the last wheel’s status as the definitive meaning does not refer to everything taught in the last wheel, but specifically concerns the teaching of Buddha-nature: ...'Although the meaning of the last wheel is praised in the sūtras and commentaries, [this does] not [refer to] everything in the last wheel, but is spoken in this way concerning the definitive meaning position of demonstrating the [Buddha-]nature.' Duckworth, D., Mipam on Buddha-Nature, pp. 4-5. |
All beings have Buddha-nature | |
Position: | |
If "Qualified", explain: | |
Notes: | |
Which Wheel Turning | |
Position: | Third Turning |
Notes: | Buddha-nature is a third wheel teaching, but he holds both third and second to be of definitive meaning and integrates the two as noncontradictory in his presentation of buddha-nature as the unity of emptiness and appearance. Duckworth, D., Mipam on Buddha-Nature, pp. 4-5. |
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Zhentong vs Rangtong | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Promotes how many vehicles? | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
What is Buddha-nature? | |
Position: | |
Notes: | * "Mipam states that the basic element (Buddha-nature) is empty of adventitious defilements, yet not empty of consummate qualities. These consummate qualities are inseparable from the suchness of phenomena that is
luminous clarity and self-existing wisdom." Duckworth, D., Mipam on Buddha-Nature, p. 18.
|
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་) | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Causal nature of the vajrapāda | |
Position: |