Difference between revisions of "Ratnākaraśānti"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Person | {{Person | ||
− | |||
|HasDrlPage=Yes | |HasDrlPage=Yes | ||
|HasLibPage=Yes | |HasLibPage=Yes | ||
|HasBnwPage=Yes | |HasBnwPage=Yes | ||
+ | |pagename=Ratnākaraśānti | ||
|PersonType=Classical Indian Authors | |PersonType=Classical Indian Authors | ||
+ | |images=File:Shantipa.jpg | ||
+ | |MainNameTib=རིན་ཆེན་འབྱུང་གནས་ཞི་བ་ | ||
|MainNameWylie=rin chen 'byung gnas zhi ba | |MainNameWylie=rin chen 'byung gnas zhi ba | ||
− | | | + | |MainNameDev=रत्नाकरशान्ति |
|MainNameSkt=Ratnākaraśānti | |MainNameSkt=Ratnākaraśānti | ||
|AltNamesWylie=slob dpon shan+ti pa | |AltNamesWylie=slob dpon shan+ti pa | ||
|AltNamesTib=སློབ་དཔོན་ཤནྟི་པ་ | |AltNamesTib=སློབ་དཔོན་ཤནྟི་པ་ | ||
|AltNamesOther=Śāntipa | |AltNamesOther=Śāntipa | ||
+ | |YearBirth=late-10th century | ||
+ | |YearDeath=early-11th century | ||
+ | |DatesNotes=Dates from The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 2014. | ||
|ReligiousAffiliation=Vikramaśilā | |ReligiousAffiliation=Vikramaśilā | ||
|TeacherOf=Maitrīpa | |TeacherOf=Maitrīpa | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P0RK153 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P0RK153 | ||
+ | |TolLink=https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Ratnakarasanti/23 | ||
+ | |tolExcerpt=Ratnākaraśānti was an Indian scholar and tantric adept who lived during the late tenth and early eleventh century. The head of the great Indian monastery Vikramaśīla, he was a teacher to Atiśa, Maitrīpā, Śraddhākaravarman, and Drokmi Śākya Yeshe, among others. Forty of his compositions are included in the Tibetan Tengyur. In his esoteric works he sought to explain tantric practice from a Yogācāra interpretation of the Perfection of Wisdom literature. | ||
+ | |BnwShortPersonBio=A circa 11th century Indian scholar that was one of the gate-keepers at the great monastic university of Vikramaśīla, as well as being included in the list of the eighty-four mahāsiddhas under the name Śāntipa. He was a prolific author and proponent of the Yogācāra school that was outspoken in his attempts to harmonize this school of thought with the philosophy of the Madhyamaka school. Though the majority of his known works, many of which were preserved in the Tibetan canon, covered topics related to Tantra. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Qualified No | |PosAllBuddha=Qualified No | ||
− | |PosAllBuddhaNote=He accepts a pure nature that is the five wisdom's | + | |PosAllBuddhaNote=He accepts a pure nature that is the five wisdom's which are possessed, but obscured in sentient beings, but in terms of buddha-nature as a seed, only bodhisattvas have it. |
− | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="...he suggests that only bodhisattvas have Buddha-nature, that is, the spiritual disposition to become a buddha, whereas others do not." [[Kano | + | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="...he suggests that only bodhisattvas have Buddha-nature, that is, the spiritual disposition to become a buddha, whereas others do not." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 75. |
− | |PosYogaMadhyaNotes=There are apparently different takes on this issue: | + | |PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra |
− | #Nirākāra Vijñānavāda, though as Kano states: "he defines the Madhyamaka position in accordance with the | + | |PosYogaMadhyaNotes=There are apparently different takes on this issue, particularly whether he was a Yogācāran who accepted Madhyamaka or whether he was a Mādhyamika who accepted Yogācāra: |
− | #"In sum, in his works Ratnākaraśānti generally sees himself as a Mādhyamika, but one who integrates many essential elements of Yogācāra and the teachings on buddha nature, such as emphasizing the soteriologically crucial role of mind’s nature being nondual lucid self-awareness—the tathāgata heart—which is only obscured by adventitious stains and needs to be experienced in an unmediated manner as what it truly is." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 61. | + | #Nirākāra Vijñānavāda, though as Kano states: "he defines the Madhyamaka position in accordance with the ''Madhyāntavibhāga's'', description of the “middle way.” Indeed, he repeats throughout his works that the doctrine of the Mādhyamikas and that of the Yogācāras are completely compatible." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 73. |
+ | #"In sum, in his works Ratnākaraśānti generally sees himself as a Mādhyamika, but one who integrates many essential elements of Yogācāra and the teachings on buddha nature, such as emphasizing the soteriologically crucial role of mind’s nature being nondual lucid self-awareness—the tathāgata heart—which is only obscured by adventitious stains and needs to be experienced in an unmediated manner as what it truly is." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 61. | ||
|PosVehicles=3 | |PosVehicles=3 | ||
− | |PosVehiclesNotes=[[Kano | + | |PosVehiclesNotes=[[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 76. |
− | |PosEmptyLumin= | + | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
− | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="Ratnākaraśānti generally describes the tathāgata heart as being equivalent to naturally luminous mind, nondual self-awareness, and the perfect nature (which he considers to be an implicative negation and not a nonimplicative negation). | + | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="Ratnākaraśānti generally describes the tathāgata heart as being equivalent to naturally luminous mind, nondual self-awareness, and the perfect nature (which he considers to be an implicative negation and not a nonimplicative negation). As for the ontological status of mind, his ''Prajñāpāramitopadeśa'' says that it does not exist as apprehender and apprehended, but the existence of the sheer lucidity of experience cannot be denied." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 58. |
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 12:03, 23 July 2020
རིན་ཆེན་འབྱུང་གནས་ཞི་བ་
Wylie | rin chen 'byung gnas zhi ba |
---|---|
Devanagari | रत्नाकरशान्ति |
Romanized Sanskrit | Ratnākaraśānti |
Other names
- སློབ་དཔོན་ཤནྟི་པ་
- slob dpon shan+ti pa
Alternate names
- Śāntipa
Dates
Birth: | late-10th century |
---|---|
Death: | early-11th century |
Notes on dates: | Dates from The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, 2014. |
Tibetan calendar dates
About
- Religious Affiliation
- Vikramaśilā
- Students
- Maitrīpa
Other Biographical info:
Links
- BDRC Link
- https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P0RK153
- Treasury of Lives Link
- https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Ratnakarasanti/23
- Wiki Pages
Buddha Nature Project
- Person description or short bio
- A circa 11th century Indian scholar that was one of the gate-keepers at the great monastic university of Vikramaśīla, as well as being included in the list of the eighty-four mahāsiddhas under the name Śāntipa. He was a prolific author and proponent of the Yogācāra school that was outspoken in his attempts to harmonize this school of thought with the philosophy of the Madhyamaka school. Though the majority of his known works, many of which were preserved in the Tibetan canon, covered topics related to Tantra.
Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.
Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional? | |
---|---|
Position: | |
Notes: | |
All beings have Buddha-nature | |
Position: | Qualified No |
If "Qualified", explain: | He accepts a pure nature that is the five wisdom's which are possessed, but obscured in sentient beings, but in terms of buddha-nature as a seed, only bodhisattvas have it. |
Notes: | "...he suggests that only bodhisattvas have Buddha-nature, that is, the spiritual disposition to become a buddha, whereas others do not." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 75. |
Which Wheel Turning | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka | |
Position: | Yogācāra |
Notes: | There are apparently different takes on this issue, particularly whether he was a Yogācāran who accepted Madhyamaka or whether he was a Mādhyamika who accepted Yogācāra:
|
Zhentong vs Rangtong | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Promotes how many vehicles? | |
Position: | 3 |
Notes: | Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 76. |
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
What is Buddha-nature? | |
Position: | Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
Notes: | "Ratnākaraśānti generally describes the tathāgata heart as being equivalent to naturally luminous mind, nondual self-awareness, and the perfect nature (which he considers to be an implicative negation and not a nonimplicative negation). As for the ontological status of mind, his Prajñāpāramitopadeśa says that it does not exist as apprehender and apprehended, but the existence of the sheer lucidity of experience cannot be denied." Brunnhölzl, K., When the Clouds Part, p. 58. |
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་) | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Causal nature of the vajrapāda | |
Position: |