Paryudāsapratiṣedha

+ Add to BuNay
View on BuNay

Key Term	paryudāsapratiṣedha
Hover Popup Choices	implicative negation; affirming negation; ma yin gak
In Tibetan Script	མ་ཡིན་དགག་
Wylie Tibetan Transliteration	ma yin dgag
Devanagari Sanskrit Script	पर्युदासप्रतिषेध
Romanized Sanskrit	paryudāsapratiṣedha
Tibetan Phonetic Rendering	ma yin gak
English Standard	implicative negation
Karl Brunnhölzl's English Term	implicative negation
Richard Barron's English Term	qualified negation
Jeffrey Hopkin's English Term	affirming negation
Gyurme Dorje's English Term	implicitly affirmative negation
Term Type	Noun
Source Language	Sanskrit
Basic Meaning	A negation that denies one thing in such a way that it clearly implies another.
Has the Sense of	This is the type of negation most commonly used by proponents of other-emptiness. For instance, by denying the existence of adventitious stains, they imply the presence of enlightened qualities.
Related Terms	prasajyapratiṣedha
Definitions
Tshig mdzod Chen mo	dgag pa'i nang gses/ rang dngos su rtogs pa'i blo'am rang brjod pa'i sgras rang gi dgag bya bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan 'phen pa/ lhas sbyin tshon po nyin par zas mi za/ zhes pa lta bu/ tshon po yin pas zas za bar bstan cing/ nyin par zas za ba bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan te mtshan mor zas za ba don gyis 'phangs pa'o
Other Definitions	In contrast to a nonimplicative negation—the linguistically-bound negation of deconstruction—an implicative negation (Sanskrit paryudāsa-pratiṣedha; Tibetan ma yin dgag) is the type of negation preferred by the proponents of “other-emptiness,” like the Jonang tradition, in the way they approach the ultimate truth. An implicative negation is a negation that points beyond its constructed identity to something other. In this case, the system of linguistic representation does not merely deconstruct itself and succumb to the absence of its self-referential self-destruction. Rather, it is understood to imply, or presume, something else. The classic example of an implicative negation is: “The fat Devadatta does not eat during the day.” While this statement is explicitly a negation, the connotative force of the statement implies something else: that he eats at night. This leaves the interpreter with an unstated, yet implied, state of affairs. In contrast, when we consider the classic example of a nonimplicative negation, “Brahmins should not drink alcohol,” we can see how the connotative force of this negation is simple denial devoid of implication. (Douglas Duckworth, "Onto-theology and Emptiness: The Nature of Buddha-Nature" [Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82, no. 4, 2014], 1076).

A negation that denies one thing in such a way that it clearly implies another.

A negation that denies one thing in such a way that it clearly implies another.

A negation that denies one thing in such a way that it clearly implies another.

The state of being devoid of that which is wholly different rather than being void of its own nature. The term is generally used to refer to the ultimate, or buddha-nature, being empty of other phenomena such as adventitious defiling emotions but not empty of its true nature.

Mental stains that are not inherent to the nature of the mind but are temporarily present as the residue of past actions or habitual tendencies. It is sometimes iterated as adventitious defilements (Skt. āgantukakleśa, Tib. glo bur gyi nyon mongs), which references the fickle and temporary nature of disturbing emotions that lack an ultimately established basis for existence.

The qualities or attributes of an enlightened being.

A negation that merely denies the existence of something without implicitly suggesting an alternative.

"Ultimate truth" or "absolute truth"; the reality of things as they truly are.