Difference between revisions of "Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Person | {{Person | ||
+ | |BuNayDefProvComplex=No | ||
+ | |PosAllBuddha=Yes | ||
+ | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakāya, tathatā and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | ||
+ | |BuNayWheelTurnComplex=No | ||
+ | |BuNayYogaMadhyaComplex=No | ||
+ | |BuNayZhenRangComplex=No | ||
+ | |BuNayVehiclesComplex=No | ||
+ | |BuNayAnalyticMeditComplex=No | ||
+ | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) | ||
+ | |BuNayEmptyLuminComplex=No | ||
+ | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | ||
|pagename=Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas | |pagename=Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas | ||
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors | |PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors | ||
Line 15: | Line 26: | ||
|TeacherOf=Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas | |TeacherOf=Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 15:44, 25 July 2023
Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas on the DRL
གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
Wylie | gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas |
---|---|
English Phonetics | Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne |
Dates
Birth: | 11th century |
---|
Tibetan calendar dates
About
- Religious Affiliation
- Bka' gdams pa
- Teachers
- Rngog blo ldan shes rab · Atīśa · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas
- Students
- Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas
Other Biographical info:
Links
- Wiki Pages
Buddha Nature Project
- Person description or short bio
Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.
Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional? | |
---|---|
Position: | |
Notes: | |
All beings have Buddha-nature | |
Position: | Yes |
If "Qualified", explain: | |
Notes: | "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakāya, tathatā and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
Which Wheel Turning | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Zhentong vs Rangtong | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Promotes how many vehicles? | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
What is Buddha-nature? | |
Position: | Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) |
Notes: | "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་) | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Causal nature of the vajrapāda | |
Position: |