Difference between revisions of "Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|MainNameTib=གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
 
|MainNameTib=གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
 
|MainNameWylie=gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
 
|MainNameWylie=gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
|YearBirth=11th/12th century
+
|YearBirth=11th century
 
|ReligiousAffiliation=Bka' gdams pa
 
|ReligiousAffiliation=Bka' gdams pa
 
|StudentOf=Rngog blo ldan shes rab; Atīśa; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas
 
|StudentOf=Rngog blo ldan shes rab; Atīśa; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas

Revision as of 18:58, 30 October 2019

Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas on the DRL

གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
Wylie gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
English Phonetics Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne
Dates
Birth:   11th century


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Religious Affiliation
Bka' gdams pa
Teachers
Rngog blo ldan shes rab · Atīśa · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas
Students
Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio
Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne was a disciple of rNgog lo tsā ba Blo ldan shes rab. Among his important works include a biography (rnam thar) of Blo ldan shes rab as well as the Great Stages of the Doctrine (Bstan rim chen mo), which served as a model for Tsongkhapa's Lam rim texts.

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position:
Notes:
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Yes
If "Qualified", explain:
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.
Which Wheel Turning
Position:
Notes:
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position:
Notes:
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position:
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to

endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatä as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.

Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position:

"Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.