Difference between revisions of "Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision imported)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465
 
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465
 
|PosAllBuddha=Yes
 
|PosAllBuddha=Yes
 +
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340.
 
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
 
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
 +
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to
 +
endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatä as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340.
 
|IsInGyatsa=No
 
|IsInGyatsa=No
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 13:33, 21 March 2018

Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas on the DRL

གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
Wylie gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
Dates
Birth:   11th/12th Century


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Teachers
Rngog blo ldan shes rab · Atīśa · tshul khrims 'byung gnas
Students
Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge · tshul khrims 'byung gnas

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position:
Notes:
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Yes
If "Qualified", explain:
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.
Which Wheel Turning
Position:
Notes:
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position:
Notes:
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position:
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to

endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatä as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.

Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position:

"Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.