Difference between revisions of "Btsan kha bo che"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | ||
|PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | |PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | ||
− | |PosAnalyticMeditNotes="These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (thos bsam gyi lugs) and "meditative tradition" (sgom lugs)." [[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242 | + | |PosAnalyticMeditNotes=*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (thos bsam gyi lugs) and "meditative tradition" (sgom lugs)." [[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242 |
+ | *"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos bshad lugs), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos sgom lugs)." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 123. | ||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | ||
− | |PosEmptyLuminNotes= | + | |PosEmptyLuminNotes=*[[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan. |
− | + | *[[Mathes, K.]], [[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]], p. 33. | |
+ | *"According to BA,[66] those who follow the tradition of Dsen Kawoché (Tib. Btsan Kha bo che) hold that since the tathāgata heart is the naturally luminous nature of the mind, it is the powerful vital cause of buddhahood. TOK agrees, saying that, according to the Eighth Situpa, the texts in Dsen Kawoché’s lineage accepted a really established, self-aware, self-luminous cognition empty of the duality of apprehender and apprehended to be the powerful vital cause of buddhahood." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 65. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:34, 16 March 2018
Wylie | btsan kha bo che |
---|
Birth: | 1021 |
---|
Tibetan calendar dates
Day | |
---|---|
Month | |
Gender | Female |
Element | Iron |
Animal | Bird |
Rab Jyung |
- Religious Affiliation
- bka' gdams
- Teachers
- grwa pa mngon shes · Sajjana
Other Biographical info:
- 1076. Together with Rngog Blo-ldan-shes-rab, Rwa Lo Rdo-rje-grags-pa, Khyung-po Chos-kyi-brtson-'grus travelled to Kashmir to study with Sadzdza-na and others. Worked with Gzu Chos-kyi-rdo-rje.
- 1089. Return to Tibet and begins to teach the Byams chos sde lnga at Yar-stod Brag-rgya. His school of exegesis of the Byams chos sde lnga became known as the Btsan lugs.
- Wiki Pages
- Person description or short bio
Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.
Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional? | |
---|---|
Position: | |
Notes: | |
All beings have Buddha-nature | |
Position: | |
If "Qualified", explain: | |
Notes: | |
Which Wheel Turning | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Zhentong vs Rangtong | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Promotes how many vehicles? | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition | |
Position: | Meditative Tradition |
Notes: | *"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (thos bsam gyi lugs) and "meditative tradition" (sgom lugs)." Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 242
|
What is Buddha-nature? | |
Position: | Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
Notes: | *Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan.
|
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་) | |
Position: | |
Notes: | |
Causal nature of the vajrapāda | |
Position: |
"Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.