Property:PosVehiclesNotes

From Tsadra Commons
Revision as of 12:39, 28 February 2018 by Jeremi (talk | contribs) (Created a property of type Has type::Text)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 9 pages using this property.
A
[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 110.  +
"In his auto-commentary on the ''Bodhipathapradīpa'', Atiśa explains the term ''so sor thar pa’i sdom pa'' and associates the Buddha-nature doctrine with that of the Great Madhyamaka (''dbu ma chen po''), which teaches that there is nobody who is not a recipient of the Mahāyāna (i.e. ekayāna)." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 101.  +
G
"Gyeltsap thus shows that ultimately both buddhas and sentient beings share the same suchness of mind which is the ultimate nature of mind that is free from natural defilements. Because of this he argues that all sentient beings have tathāgata-essence, and it is through this that he establishes the connection between tathāgata-essence and the concept of one-vehicle, the notion that ultimately there is only the final goal of buddhahood." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]], ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 99.  +
H
Hodor. Hodor HODOR hodor, hodor hodor, hodor, hodor hodor. Hodor hodor, hodor. Hodor HODOR hodor, hodor hodor, hodor, hodor hodor. Hodor hodor - hodor hodor hodor - hodor, hodor. Hodor hodor?! Hodor hodor HODOR! Hodor HODOR hodor, hodor hodor... Hodor hodor hodor; hodor HODOR hodor, hodor hodor. Hodor. Hodor hodor HODOR! Hodor hodor hodor hodor... Hodor hodor hodor. Hodor.  +
J
*[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 150. *"One problem with Jayānanda’s position is that, having asserted that the Buddha-nature doctrine is provisional, he utilizes it as an authoritative teaching for establishing the single-vehicle theory, which he takes to be a definitive teaching." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 152.   +
[[Mathes, K.]], [[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]], p. 42.  +
K
"In his ''Madhyamakāloka'', Kamalaśīla presents the position of an opponent who takes the three-vehicle theory to be definitive. He refutes that position and makes the case for the single-vehicle theory being definitive by quoting a number of sutra passages." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 9.  +
R
[[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 76.  +
S
"Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 327.  +