Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas

From Tsadra Commons
Revision as of 15:44, 25 July 2023 by AlexC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas on the DRL

གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་
Wylie gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
English Phonetics Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne
Dates
Birth:   11th century


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Religious Affiliation
Bka' gdams pa
Teachers
Rngog blo ldan shes rab · Atīśa · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas
Students
Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position:
Notes:
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Yes
If "Qualified", explain:
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakāya, tathatā and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.
Which Wheel Turning
Position:
Notes:
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position:
Notes:
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position:
Notes:
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities)
Notes: "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340.
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position: