Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas: Difference between revisions
Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Person | {{Person | ||
|BuNayDefProvComplex=No | |||
|PosAllBuddha=Yes | |||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakāya, tathatā and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | |||
|BuNayWheelTurnComplex=No | |||
|BuNayYogaMadhyaComplex=No | |||
|BuNayZhenRangComplex=No | |||
|BuNayVehiclesComplex=No | |||
|BuNayAnalyticMeditComplex=No | |||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) | |||
|BuNayEmptyLuminComplex=No | |||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | |||
|pagename=Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas | |pagename=Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas | ||
|PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors | |PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors | ||
Line 15: | Line 26: | ||
|TeacherOf=Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas | |TeacherOf=Phywa pa chos kyi seng+ge; Tshul khrims 'byung gnas | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 15:44, 25 July 2023
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne |
MainNameTib | གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་ |
MainNameWylie | gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas |
YearBirth | 11th century |
ReligiousAffiliation | Bka' gdams pa |
StudentOf | Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab · Atīśa · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas |
TeacherOf | Chapa Chökyi Senge · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakāya, tathatā and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
Other wikis |
|