Sajjana: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes=[[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 46. | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes=[[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 46. | ||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="As to the interpretation of Buddha-nature, on the other hand, Sajjana and rNgog hold different views, for Sajjana equates Buddha-nature with the luminous mind, which is not empty, while rNgog equates it with emptiness." [[Kano | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="As to the interpretation of Buddha-nature, on the other hand, Sajjana and rNgog hold different views, for Sajjana equates Buddha-nature with the luminous mind, which is not empty, while rNgog equates it with emptiness." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 239. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 14:14, 27 November 2019
PersonType | Category:Classical Indian Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Sajjana |
MainNameTib | ས་ཛ་ན་ |
MainNameWylie | sa dza na |
MainNameDev | सज्जन |
MainNameSkt | Sajjana |
AltNamesTib | པཎྜི་ཏ་ས་ཛ་ན་ · ས་ཛཛ་ན་ |
AltNamesWylie | paN+Di ta sa dza na · sa dzdza na |
NotesOnNames | In some of the recensions of the Uttaratantra, most notably in the Derge Tengyur, as well as in Dölpopa's commentary we find Sajjana's name rendered into Sanskrit as Sadjñāna. |
YearBirth | 11th century |
BornIn | Kashmir |
PersonalAffiliation | Ratnavajra; Mahājana |
StudentOf | Ratnavajra |
TeacherOf | gzus dga' ba'i rdo rje · te dza de ba · btsan kha bo che · rngog blo ldan shes rab |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4920 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
BnwShortPersonBio | An 11th Century Kashmiri scholar that was the source from which many prominent Tibetan scholars and translators of the day received teachings. Most notably he taught the Uttaratantra to Ngok Lotsāwa and Tsen Khawoche, which spread in Tibet as the Ngok and Tsen traditions and became the two primary trends that influenced much of the history of the Tibetan exegesis of the treatise. He also helped Ngok translate the text and worked with several other Tibetan translators on works that were later included in the Tibetan cannon. |
PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes | Klaus-Dieter Mathes, A Direct Path to the Buddha Within, p. 46. |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | "As to the interpretation of Buddha-nature, on the other hand, Sajjana and rNgog hold different views, for Sajjana equates Buddha-nature with the luminous mind, which is not empty, while rNgog equates it with emptiness." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 239. |
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |