Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas: Difference between revisions
Gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Yes | |PosAllBuddha=Yes | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes="Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | ||
|PosEmptyLumin= | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to | ||
endorse rNgog’s idea of | endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 340. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 17:03, 25 November 2019
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne |
MainNameTib | གྲོ་ལུང་པ་བློ་གྲོས་འབྱུང་གནས་ |
MainNameWylie | gro lung pa blo gros 'byung gnas |
YearBirth | 11th century |
ReligiousAffiliation | Bka' gdams pa |
StudentOf | Ngok Lotsāwa Loden Sherab · Atīśa · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas |
TeacherOf | Chapa Chökyi Senge · Tshul khrims 'byung gnas |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3465 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
BnwShortPersonBio | Drolungpa Lodrö Jungne was a disciple of rNgog lo tsā ba Blo ldan shes rab. Among his important works include a biography (rnam thar) of Blo ldan shes rab as well as the Great Stages of the Doctrine (Bstan rim chen mo), which served as a model for Tsongkhapa's Lam rim texts. |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | "Gro-lung-pa follows faithfully rNgog’s interpretation as found in the latter’s gloss on RGV 1.27-28—the two verses that teach the dharmakäya, tathatä and the gotra as being three reasons why all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities) |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | "Gro-lung-pa appears elsewhere in the same text to
endorse rNgog’s idea of tathatā as emptiness, and follows rNgog’s position with regard to the ineffability of the ultimate." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 340. |
Other wikis |
|