Ngag dbang tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho: Difference between revisions

From Tsadra Commons
Ngag dbang tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P7843
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P7843
|BdrcPnum=P7843
|BdrcPnum=P7843
|BnwShortPersonBio=Without ever straying more than a few kilometres from the valleys of the 'Dzam thang area of southern A mdo where he was born, a stronghold of the Jo nang tradition, Tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho (1880–1940) had a very sedentary life. Still, he was exposed to a broad range of philosophical views through teachers, such as 'Ba' mda' Dge legs (1844–1904) and Ngag dbang chos 'byor (1846–1910), who also appreciated Dge lugs scholasticism and who had studied with some of the most prominent Bka' brgyud and Rnying ma authorities of the 19th century, such as Kong sprul (1813–1899), Dpal sprul (1808–1887), and Mi pham (1846–1912). (Source: Filippo Brambilla)
|BnwShortPersonBio=Tsoknyi Gyatso [was] a scholar of the Jonang tradition who was considered an incarnation of one of Dolpopa’s major disciples, Nyawon Kunga Pal (1285-1364) . . . Tsoknyi Gyatso’s writings are not only intriguing and perplexing because they present a specific species of zhentong, but they are important because they disclose to us the intentional workings of a major Jonang scholar during a fascinating period in far eastern Tibetan history. As a disciple of the great Jonang master from Dzamthang, Bamda Thubten Gelek Gyatso (1844-1904), Tsoknyi Gyatso was undoubtedly exposed to a rich nexus of views. Having lived at the crossroads of intellectual exchange during the height of the Rimé eclectic movement in Kham, Bamda Gelek studied with masters including Jamgon Kongtrul (1813-1899), Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo (1820-1892), Dza Patrul (1808-1887) and his Geluk teacher Akon. With these mentors close to his own teacher’s heart, it is safe to infer that Tsoknyi Gyatso was not only versed in the mainstream zhentong works of his own tradition from authors such as Dolpopa and Taranatha, but that he most likely inherited ways of thinking through alternative presentations of emptiness. ([https://jonangfoundation.org/blog/tsoknyi-gyatso-zhentong Source Accessed October 23, 2019])
|IsInGyatsa=No
|IsInGyatsa=No
}}
}}

Revision as of 13:42, 23 October 2019

TshognyiGyatso JonangFoundation.jpg
PersonType Category:Classical Tibetan Authors
MainNamePhon Tsoknyi Gyatso
MainNameTib ཚོགས་གཉིས་རྒྱ་མཚོ་
MainNameWylie tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho
AltNamesTib འཛམ་ཐང་མཁན་པོ་ཚོགས་གཉིས་རྒྱ་མཚོ་  ·  ངག་དབང་ཚོགས་གཉིས་རྒྱ་མཚོ་
AltNamesWylie 'dzam thang mkhan po tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho  ·  ngag dbang tshogs gnyis rgya mtsho
YearBirth 1880
YearDeath 1940
BornIn rab kha grong sde ('Dzam thang, A mdo.)
ReligiousAffiliation Jonang
StudentOf thub bstan dge legs rgya mtsho  ·  'dzong bo skyabs mgon  ·  ngag dbang chos 'dzin
TeacherOf blo gros grags pa  ·  smon lam bzang po  ·  ngag dbang bsod nams bzang po  ·  gsang sngags rgya mtsho
BDRC https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P7843
IsInGyatsa No
BnwShortPersonBio Tsoknyi Gyatso [was] a scholar of the Jonang tradition who was considered an incarnation of one of Dolpopa’s major disciples, Nyawon Kunga Pal (1285-1364) . . . Tsoknyi Gyatso’s writings are not only intriguing and perplexing because they present a specific species of zhentong, but they are important because they disclose to us the intentional workings of a major Jonang scholar during a fascinating period in far eastern Tibetan history. As a disciple of the great Jonang master from Dzamthang, Bamda Thubten Gelek Gyatso (1844-1904), Tsoknyi Gyatso was undoubtedly exposed to a rich nexus of views. Having lived at the crossroads of intellectual exchange during the height of the Rimé eclectic movement in Kham, Bamda Gelek studied with masters including Jamgon Kongtrul (1813-1899), Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo (1820-1892), Dza Patrul (1808-1887) and his Geluk teacher Akon. With these mentors close to his own teacher’s heart, it is safe to infer that Tsoknyi Gyatso was not only versed in the mainstream zhentong works of his own tradition from authors such as Dolpopa and Taranatha, but that he most likely inherited ways of thinking through alternative presentations of emptiness. (Source Accessed October 23, 2019)
Other wikis