Gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|BnwShortPersonBio=A Kadam scholar from Sangpu Neutok Monastery that was known for his expertise in the ''Five Treatises of Maitreya''. He was a senior contemporary of both Dölpopa and Butön and a teacher of the Sakya scholar Yakde Paṇchen and the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorje. | |BnwShortPersonBio=A Kadam scholar from Sangpu Neutok Monastery that was known for his expertise in the ''Five Treatises of Maitreya''. He was a senior contemporary of both Dölpopa and Butön and a teacher of the Sakya scholar Yakde Paṇchen and the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorje. | ||
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | |PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | ||
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 31. | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes="Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the ''Uttaratantra'' in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings that are "exceedingly secret among the secrets," and that it teaches that all beings have a tathāgata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 31. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Yes | |PosAllBuddha=Yes | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=*"He claims that tathāgata-essence exists in all sentient beings in a fully enlightened form. He states that: the dharma-body is dharma-reality indivisible from [buddha] qualities. Since there is no objection to the fact that the dharma-body exists pervasively in all sentient beings, in the manner of one entity; it is unacceptable to present it, [i.e., the existence of the dharma-body in sentient beings] as [merely] imputed." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 32. | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=*"He claims that tathāgata-essence exists in all sentient beings in a fully enlightened form. He states that: the dharma-body is dharma-reality indivisible from [buddha] qualities. Since there is no objection to the fact that the dharma-body exists pervasively in all sentient beings, in the manner of one entity; it is unacceptable to present it, [i.e., the existence of the dharma-body in sentient beings] as [merely] imputed." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 32. | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*"Blo-gros mtshungs-med asserts that... sentient beings truly possess the dharmakāya, which is the dharmadhātu inseparable from the qualities." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 329. | *"Blo-gros mtshungs-med asserts that... sentient beings truly possess the dharmakāya, which is the dharmadhātu inseparable from the qualities." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 329. | ||
|PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | |PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | ||
|PosWheelTurnNotes=[[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 31. | |PosWheelTurnNotes="Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the ''Uttaratantra'' in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings..." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 31. | ||
|PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka | |PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka | ||
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes="Nevertheless, even though the ''Uttaratantra'' and the sutras on which the ''Uttaratantra'' is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'', Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the ''Uttaratantra'' teach emptiness. He argues: | |||
::The sutras for the ''Uttaratantra'' and the ''Uttaratantra'' [itself] do | |||
::not contradict the 'Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' because the emptiness | |||
::of inherent existence of all phenomena taught there [in the | |||
::'Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''] is the dharma-body explicated here | |||
::[in the last wheel sutras and the ''Uttaratantra'']." | |||
[[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 33. | |||
|PosVehicles=1 | |PosVehicles=1 | ||
|PosVehiclesNotes="Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 327. | |PosVehiclesNotes="Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 327. |
Revision as of 13:10, 7 August 2018
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Sangpuwa Lodrö Tsungme |
MainNameTib | གསང་ཕུ་བ་བློ་གྲོས་མཚུངས་མེད་ |
MainNameWylie | gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med |
BiographicalInfo | See Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, pp. 320-324 on the various figures known as blo gros mtshungs med. Note that the BDRC person page likely conflates two of these figures, i.e. gsang phu ba and gnyal ba. |
YearBirth | 14th Century |
BornIn | dbus |
ReligiousAffiliation | Kadam |
TeacherOf | g.yag sde paN chen · rang byung rdo rje |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P63 |
Treasury of Lives | https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/blo-gros-mtshungs-med/P63 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
BnwShortPersonBio | A Kadam scholar from Sangpu Neutok Monastery that was known for his expertise in the Five Treatises of Maitreya. He was a senior contemporary of both Dölpopa and Butön and a teacher of the Sakya scholar Yakde Paṇchen and the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorje. |
PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes | "Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the Uttaratantra in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings that are "exceedingly secret among the secrets," and that it teaches that all beings have a tathāgata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 31. |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes |
|
PosWheelTurn | Third Turning |
PosWheelTurnNotes | "Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the Uttaratantra in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings..." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 31. |
PosYogaMadhya | Madhyamaka |
PosYogaMadhyaNotes | "Nevertheless, even though the Uttaratantra and the sutras on which the Uttaratantra is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras, Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the Uttaratantra teach emptiness. He argues:
Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 33. |
PosVehicles | 1 |
PosVehiclesNotes | "Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 327. |
PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya |
PosEmptyLuminNotes |
|
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.