Btsan kha bo che: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|HasDnzPage=No | |HasDnzPage=No | ||
|HasBnwPage=Yes | |HasBnwPage=Yes | ||
|MainNamePhon=Tsen Kawoche | |||
|MainNameTib=བཙན་ཁ་བོ་ཆེ་ | |||
|MainNameWylie=btsan kha bo che | |MainNameWylie=btsan kha bo che | ||
|YearBirth=1021 | |YearBirth=1021 | ||
|TibDateGender=Female | |TibDateGender=Female | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*1089. Return to Tibet and begins to teach the Byams chos sde lnga at Yar-stod Brag-rgya. His school of exegesis of the Byams chos sde lnga became known as the Btsan lugs. | *1089. Return to Tibet and begins to teach the Byams chos sde lnga at Yar-stod Brag-rgya. His school of exegesis of the Byams chos sde lnga became known as the Btsan lugs. | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | ||
|images=File:Teaching Mudra 2.jpg | |||
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | |PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | ||
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: | ||
"The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (mtshan nyid kyi lugs) and explaining them as the meditative tradition (sgom lugs)." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the | "The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (''mtshan nyid kyi lugs'') and explaining them as the meditative tradition (''sgom lugs'')." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the explanation according to the first approach is more profound at the time of eliminating the clinging to characteristics, while the explanation according to the latter approach is needed so that the sugata heart can function as the support of qualities." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Yes | |PosAllBuddha=Yes | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | ||
|PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | |PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | ||
|PosWheelTurnNotes="Kunga Drölcho provides some context for Dsen Kawoché’s view and for the following excerpts from the latter’s teachings, which Kunga Drölcho compiled as Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness: | |PosWheelTurnNotes="Kunga Drölcho provides some context for Dsen Kawoché’s view and for the following excerpts from the latter’s teachings, which Kunga Drölcho compiled as Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness: | ||
As for the Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness, Dsen Kawoché said, "The Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana made the following very essential statement: ‘The victor turned the wheel of dharma three times—the first wheel | As for the Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness, Dsen Kawoché said, "The Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana made the following very essential statement: ‘The victor turned the wheel of dharma three times—the first wheel teaches the four realities of the noble ones, the second one teaches the lack of characteristics, and the final one makes excellent distinctions. Among these, the first two do not distinguish between what is actual and what is nominal. The last one was spoken at the point of certainty about the ultimate by distinguishing between the middle and extremes and by distinguishing between phenomena and the nature of phenomena. " [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', pp. 142-143. | ||
|PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra | |PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra | ||
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes=Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (bshad pa’i bka’ babs) and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (sgrub pa’i bka’ babs), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 124. | |PosYogaMadhyaNotes=Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (''bshad pa’i bka’ babs'') and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (''sgrub pa’i bka’ babs''), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | ||
|PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | |PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | ||
|PosAnalyticMeditNotes=*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (thos bsam gyi lugs) and "meditative tradition" (sgom lugs)." [[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242 | |PosAnalyticMeditNotes=*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (''thos bsam gyi lugs'') and "meditative tradition" (''sgom lugs'')." [[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242 | ||
*"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos bshad lugs), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos sgom lugs)." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 123. | *"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos bshad lugs''), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos sgom lugs'')." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 123. | ||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes=*[[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan. | |PosEmptyLuminNotes=*[[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan. | ||
*[[Mathes, K.]], [[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]], p. 33. | *[[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 33. | ||
*"According to BA, | *"According to BA, those who follow the tradition of Dsen Kawoché (Tib. Btsan Kha bo che) hold that since the tathāgata heart is the naturally luminous nature of the mind, it is the powerful vital cause of buddhahood. TOK agrees, saying that, according to the Eighth Situpa, the texts in Dsen Kawoché’s lineage accepted a really established, self-aware, self-luminous cognition empty of the duality of apprehender and apprehended to be the powerful vital cause of buddhahood." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 65. | ||
*Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades | *Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 124. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:30, 26 July 2018
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Tsen Kawoche |
MainNameTib | བཙན་ཁ་བོ་ཆེ་ |
MainNameWylie | btsan kha bo che |
BiographicalInfo | "Tsen Kawoché . . . is often thought to be the first Tibetan to have taught what later came to be known as the Zhentong view." See Stearns 1999, 42–3 and 88–9.
|
YearBirth | 1021 |
TibDateGender | Female |
TibDateElement | Iron |
TibDateAnimal | Bird |
ReligiousAffiliation | bka' gdams |
StudentOf | grwa pa mngon shes · Sajjana |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes | Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan:
"The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (mtshan nyid kyi lugs) and explaining them as the meditative tradition (sgom lugs)." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the explanation according to the first approach is more profound at the time of eliminating the clinging to characteristics, while the explanation according to the latter approach is needed so that the sugata heart can function as the support of qualities." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosWheelTurn | Third Turning |
PosWheelTurnNotes | "Kunga Drölcho provides some context for Dsen Kawoché’s view and for the following excerpts from the latter’s teachings, which Kunga Drölcho compiled as Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness:
As for the Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness, Dsen Kawoché said, "The Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana made the following very essential statement: ‘The victor turned the wheel of dharma three times—the first wheel teaches the four realities of the noble ones, the second one teaches the lack of characteristics, and the final one makes excellent distinctions. Among these, the first two do not distinguish between what is actual and what is nominal. The last one was spoken at the point of certainty about the ultimate by distinguishing between the middle and extremes and by distinguishing between phenomena and the nature of phenomena. " Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, pp. 142-143. |
PosYogaMadhya | Yogācāra |
PosYogaMadhyaNotes | Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (bshad pa’i bka’ babs) and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (sgrub pa’i bka’ babs), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosAnalyticMedit | Meditative Tradition |
PosAnalyticMeditNotes |
|
PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
PosEmptyLuminNotes |
|
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.