Tuttle, G.: Difference between revisions
Tuttle, G.
m (Text replace - "publicationtype" to "classification") |
m (Text replacement - "{{Footer}}" to "") |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Person | ||
|HasDrlPage=Yes | |||
|HasLibPage=Yes | |||
|HasBnwPage=Yes | |||
|PersonType=Authors of English Works; Professors | |||
|images=File:Tuttle Gray Columbia.jpg | |||
|MainNamePhon=Gray Tuttle | |||
|email=gwt2102@columbia.edu | |||
|phone=(212) 854-4096 | |||
|bio=Gray Tuttle studies the history of twentieth century Sino-Tibetan relations as well as Tibet’s relations with the China-based Manchu Qing Empire. The role of Tibetan Buddhism in these historical relations is central to all his research. In his Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (Columbia UP, 2005), he examines the failure of nationalism and race-based ideology to maintain the Tibetan territory of the former Qing empire as integral to the Chinese nation-state. Instead, he argues, a new sense of pan-Asian Buddhism was critical to Chinese efforts to hold onto Tibetan regions (one quarter of China’s current territory). His current research project, “Amdo Tibet, Middle Ground between Lhasa and Beijing (1578-1865),” is a historical analysis of the economic and cultural relations between China and Tibet in the early modern periods (16th – 19th centuries) when the intellectual and economic centers of Tibet shifted to the east, to Amdo — a Tibetan cultural region the size of France in northwestern China. Deploying Richard White’s concept of the “Middle Ground” in the context of two mature civilizations — Tibetan and Chinese — encountering one another, this book will examine how this contact led to three dramatic areas of growth that defined early modern Tibet: 1) the advent of mass monastic education, 20 the bureaucratization of reincarnate lamas’ charisma and 3) the development of modern conceptions of geography that reshaped the way Tibet was imagined. ([http://ealac.columbia.edu/gray-tuttle/ Source Accessed March 30, 2020]) | |||
|publications=* ''Sources of Tibetan Tradition'' (co-editor, Columbia, 2013) | |||
* ''The Tibetan History Reader'' (co-editor, Columbia, 2013) | |||
* ''Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China'' (Columbia, 2005) | |||
|affiliation=Columbia University | |||
|phduniversity=PhD, Harvard University | |||
|education=BA: Princeton University (’91) | |||
MA: Harvard University (’96) | |||
PhD: Harvard University (’02) | |||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |||
|classification=People | |||
}} | |||
== Full Name == | == Full Name == | ||
Gray Tuttle | Gray Tuttle | ||
Line 9: | Line 31: | ||
== Publications == | == Publications == | ||
Latest revision as of 14:42, 5 June 2024
PersonType | Category:Authors of English Works Category:Professors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Gray Tuttle |
bio | Gray Tuttle studies the history of twentieth century Sino-Tibetan relations as well as Tibet’s relations with the China-based Manchu Qing Empire. The role of Tibetan Buddhism in these historical relations is central to all his research. In his Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (Columbia UP, 2005), he examines the failure of nationalism and race-based ideology to maintain the Tibetan territory of the former Qing empire as integral to the Chinese nation-state. Instead, he argues, a new sense of pan-Asian Buddhism was critical to Chinese efforts to hold onto Tibetan regions (one quarter of China’s current territory). His current research project, “Amdo Tibet, Middle Ground between Lhasa and Beijing (1578-1865),” is a historical analysis of the economic and cultural relations between China and Tibet in the early modern periods (16th – 19th centuries) when the intellectual and economic centers of Tibet shifted to the east, to Amdo — a Tibetan cultural region the size of France in northwestern China. Deploying Richard White’s concept of the “Middle Ground” in the context of two mature civilizations — Tibetan and Chinese — encountering one another, this book will examine how this contact led to three dramatic areas of growth that defined early modern Tibet: 1) the advent of mass monastic education, 20 the bureaucratization of reincarnate lamas’ charisma and 3) the development of modern conceptions of geography that reshaped the way Tibet was imagined. (Source Accessed March 30, 2020) |
affiliation | Columbia University |
phduniversity | PhD, Harvard University |
education | BA: Princeton University (’91)
MA: Harvard University (’96)
PhD: Harvard University (’02) |
publications |
|
IsInGyatsa | No |
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
Full Name[edit]
Gray Tuttle