Btsan kha bo che: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(29 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Person | {{Person | ||
|HasDrlPage= | |pagename=Btsan kha bo che | ||
|HasLibPage= | |PersonType=Classical Tibetan Authors | ||
|HasDrlPage=Yes | |||
|HasLibPage=Yes | |||
|HasRtzPage=No | |HasRtzPage=No | ||
|HasDnzPage=No | |HasDnzPage=No | ||
|HasBnwPage=Yes | |HasBnwPage=Yes | ||
| | |MainNamePhon=Tsen Khawoche | ||
|MainNameTib=བཙན་ཁ་བོ་ཆེ་ | |||
|MainNameWylie=btsan kha bo che | |MainNameWylie=btsan kha bo che | ||
| | |AltNamesWylie=dri med shes rab | ||
|AltNamesTib=དྲི་མེད་ཤེས་རབ་ | |||
|YearBirth=1021 | |YearBirth=1021 | ||
|TibDateGender=Female | |TibDateGender=Female | ||
|TibDateElement=Iron | |TibDateElement=Iron | ||
|TibDateAnimal=Bird | |TibDateAnimal=Bird | ||
|ReligiousAffiliation= | |ReligiousAffiliation=Kadam | ||
|StudentOf=grwa pa mngon shes; Sajjana | |StudentOf=grwa pa mngon shes; Sajjana | ||
|BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | |BdrcLink=https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 | ||
|TolLink=https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Tsen-Khawoche/7113 | |||
|tolExcerpt=Tsen Khawoche was an eleventh-century disciple of the Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana. He is credited by Tibetan historians for giving rise to the "meditative" tradition of exegesis of the ''Ratnagotravibhāga'', a main source of buddha-nature theory in Tibet, which heavily influenced Mahāmudrā and the "other-emptiness" philosophical position. | |||
|BnwShortPersonBio=The namesake of the Tsen Tradition (''btsan lugs'') of the exegesis of the ''Uttaratantra'', commonly referred to as the Meditation Tradition (''sgom lugs''). He travelled to Kashmir when he was in his mid-50's in 1076 along with Ngok Lotsāwa and others to study with various scholars, including Sajjana. With Zu Gawai Dorje acting as his translator, he famously requested instructions on the ''Uttaratantra'' from Sajjana in order to make it his "death practice" ('''chi chos''). These instructions became the basis for the Tsen Tradition, which was an important progenitor for later interpretations of the ''Uttaratantra'', such as those associated with Zhentong and Mahāmudrā. He returned to Tibet in 1089, some two or three years before Ngok, and thus was likely the first Tibetan to begin propagating the teachings he had received from Sajjana on the ''Five Treatises of Maitreya'' on Tibetan soil. | |||
|PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | |PosBuNayDefProv=Definitive | ||
|PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: | |PosBuNayDefProvNotes=Karl Brunnhölzl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: | ||
"The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (mtshan nyid kyi lugs) and explaining them as the meditative tradition (sgom lugs)." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the | "The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (''mtshan nyid kyi lugs'') and explaining them as the meditative tradition (''sgom lugs'')." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the explanation according to the first approach is more profound at the time of eliminating the clinging to characteristics, while the explanation according to the latter approach is needed so that the sugata heart can function as the support of qualities." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | ||
|PosAllBuddha=Yes | |PosAllBuddha=Yes | ||
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades | |PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=Karl Brunnhölzl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | ||
|PosWheelTurn=Third Turning | |||
|PosWheelTurnNotes="Kunga Drölcho provides some context for Dsen Kawoché’s view and for the following excerpts from the latter’s teachings, which Kunga Drölcho compiled as Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness: | |||
As for the Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness, Dsen Kawoché said, "The Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana made the following very essential statement: ‘The victor turned the wheel of dharma three times—the first wheel teaches the four realities of the noble ones, the second one teaches the lack of characteristics, and the final one makes excellent distinctions. Among these, the first two do not distinguish between what is actual and what is nominal. The last one was spoken at the point of certainty about the ultimate by distinguishing between the middle and extremes and by distinguishing between phenomena and the nature of phenomena. " [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', pp. 142-143. | |||
|PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra | |||
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes=Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (''bshad pa’i bka’ babs'') and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (''sgrub pa’i bka’ babs''), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124. | |||
|PosZhenRangNotes=He predates the category, but as Stearns remarks, "Tsen Kawoché . . . is often thought to be the first Tibetan to have taught what later came to be known as the Zhentong view." See [[Stearns, C.]], [[The Buddha from Dolpo]], pp. 42–3 and pp. 88–9. | |||
|PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | |PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | ||
|PosAnalyticMeditNotes=*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (thos bsam gyi lugs) and "meditative tradition" (sgom lugs)." [[Kano | |PosAnalyticMeditNotes=*"These two traditions of rngog and btsan were respectively called the "analytical tradition" (''thos bsam gyi lugs'') and "meditative tradition" (''sgom lugs'')." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242 | ||
*"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos bshad lugs), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (byams chos sgom lugs)." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 123. | *"The lineage through Ngog Lotsāwa is often called "the exegetical tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos bshad lugs''), while Dsen Kawoché’s transmissions represent "the meditative tradition of the dharma works of Maitreya" (''byams chos sgom lugs'')." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 123. | ||
|PosEmptyLumin= | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes=*[[Kano. K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan. | |PosEmptyLuminNotes=*[[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 242, footnote 4. Van der Kuijp via Shakya mchog ldan. | ||
*[[Mathes, K.]], [[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]], p. 33. | *Mathes cites Gö Lotsāwa as stating, "The followers of the tradition of Tsen (Btsan) maintain that since the luminous nature of mind is the buddha nature, the cause of buddha[hood] is fertile" [[Mathes, K.]], ''[[A Direct Path to the Buddha Within]]'', p. 33. | ||
*"According to BA, | *"According to BA, those who follow the tradition of Dsen Kawoché (Tib. Btsan Kha bo che) hold that since the tathāgata heart is the naturally luminous nature of the mind, it is the powerful vital cause of buddhahood. TOK agrees, saying that, according to the Eighth Situpa, the texts in Dsen Kawoché’s lineage accepted a really established, self-aware, self-luminous cognition empty of the duality of apprehender and apprehended to be the powerful vital cause of buddhahood." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 65. | ||
*Karl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades | *Karl Brunnhölzl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], [[When the Clouds Part]], p. 124. | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:42, 4 March 2020
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Tsen Khawoche |
MainNameTib | བཙན་ཁ་བོ་ཆེ་ |
MainNameWylie | btsan kha bo che |
AltNamesTib | དྲི་མེད་ཤེས་རབ་ |
AltNamesWylie | dri med shes rab |
YearBirth | 1021 |
TibDateGender | Female |
TibDateElement | Iron |
TibDateAnimal | Bird |
ReligiousAffiliation | Kadam |
StudentOf | grwa pa mngon shes · Sajjana |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4654 |
Treasury of Lives | https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Tsen-Khawoche/7113 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
BnwShortPersonBio | The namesake of the Tsen Tradition (btsan lugs) of the exegesis of the Uttaratantra, commonly referred to as the Meditation Tradition (sgom lugs). He travelled to Kashmir when he was in his mid-50's in 1076 along with Ngok Lotsāwa and others to study with various scholars, including Sajjana. With Zu Gawai Dorje acting as his translator, he famously requested instructions on the Uttaratantra from Sajjana in order to make it his "death practice" ('chi chos). These instructions became the basis for the Tsen Tradition, which was an important progenitor for later interpretations of the Uttaratantra, such as those associated with Zhentong and Mahāmudrā. He returned to Tibet in 1089, some two or three years before Ngok, and thus was likely the first Tibetan to begin propagating the teachings he had received from Sajjana on the Five Treatises of Maitreya on Tibetan soil. |
PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes | Karl Brunnhölzl cites ShAkya mchog ldan:
"The definitive meaning that he found from having studied the dharmas of Maitreya is explained by those in his lineage as follows. The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades [everyone] from buddhas to sentient beings. In earlier times these [two approaches] were known as "the difference between explaining the dharmas of Maitreya as the tradition of characteristics (mtshan nyid kyi lugs) and explaining them as the meditative tradition (sgom lugs)." However, in both cases there is no contradiction because the explanation according to the first approach is more profound at the time of eliminating the clinging to characteristics, while the explanation according to the latter approach is needed so that the sugata heart can function as the support of qualities." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | Karl Brunnhölzl cites ShAkya mchog ldan: "The sugata heart is the naturally pure wisdom, luminous by nature, that pervades everyone from buddhas to sentient beings." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosWheelTurn | Third Turning |
PosWheelTurnNotes | "Kunga Drölcho provides some context for Dsen Kawoché’s view and for the following excerpts from the latter’s teachings, which Kunga Drölcho compiled as Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness:
As for the Guiding Instructions on the View of Other-Emptiness, Dsen Kawoché said, "The Kashmiri paṇḍita Sajjana made the following very essential statement: ‘The victor turned the wheel of dharma three times—the first wheel teaches the four realities of the noble ones, the second one teaches the lack of characteristics, and the final one makes excellent distinctions. Among these, the first two do not distinguish between what is actual and what is nominal. The last one was spoken at the point of certainty about the ultimate by distinguishing between the middle and extremes and by distinguishing between phenomena and the nature of phenomena. " Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, pp. 142-143. |
PosYogaMadhya | Yogācāra |
PosYogaMadhyaNotes | Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (bshad pa’i bka’ babs) and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (sgrub pa’i bka’ babs), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." Karl Brunnhölzl, When the Clouds Part, p. 124. |
PosZhenRangNotes | He predates the category, but as Stearns remarks, "Tsen Kawoché . . . is often thought to be the first Tibetan to have taught what later came to be known as the Zhentong view." See Cyrus Stearns, The Buddha from Dolpo, pp. 42–3 and pp. 88–9. |
PosAnalyticMedit | Meditative Tradition |
PosAnalyticMeditNotes |
|
PosEmptyLumin | Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
PosEmptyLuminNotes |
|
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |