Difference between revisions of "Jayānanda"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
 
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 151.
 
|PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes=[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 151.
 
|PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra
 
|PosYogaMadhya=Yogācāra
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes=Though he was a Madhyamaka, he likely equates the buddha-nature teachings with Yogācāra, as he deems both to be provisional.
+
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes=Though he was a followed of Madhyamaka, he likely equates the buddha-nature teachings with Yogācāra, as he deems both to be provisional.
 
|PosVehicles=1
 
|PosVehicles=1
 
|PosVehiclesNotes=*[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 150.
 
|PosVehiclesNotes=*[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 150.
*"One problem with Jayänanda’s position is that, having asserted that the Buddha-nature doctrine is provisional, he utilizes it as an authoritative teaching for establishing the single-vehicle theory, which he takes to be a definitive teaching." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 152.
+
*"One problem with Jayānanda’s position is that, having asserted that the Buddha-nature doctrine is provisional, he utilizes it as an authoritative teaching for establishing the single-vehicle theory, which he takes to be a definitive teaching." [[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 152.
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Nonimplicative Negation
+
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities)
 +
|IsInGyatsa=No
 
|PosSvataPrasa=Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
 
|PosSvataPrasa=Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
 
|PosSvataPrasaNotes=*[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 148.
 
|PosSvataPrasaNotes=*[[Kano, K.]], [[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]], p. 148.
 
*[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 14.
 
*[[Wangchuk, Tsering]], [[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]], p. 14.
|IsInGyatsa=No
 
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 10:46, 26 November 2019

Jayānanda on the DRL

རྒྱལ་བ་ཀུན་དགའ་
Wylie rgyal ba kun dga'
Romanized Sanskrit Jayānanda
Other names
  • ཁ་ཆེའི་པཎྜི་ཏ་ཛཱ་ཡ་ཨ་ནནྡ་
  • kha che'i paN+Di ta dzA ya a nan+da
Dates
Birth:   11th century
Death:   12th century


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Students
rma bya byang chub brtson 'grus

Other Biographical info:

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P4CZ15242
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio
Jayānanda (Tib. རྒྱལ་བ་ཀུན་དགའ, gyalwa kün ga, Wyl. rgyal ba kun dga') was the author of an important commentary on the Introduction to the Middle Way (Madhyamakāvatāra) by Candrakīrti.

The Tibetan literature has not preserved very much about Jayānanda. He appears to have publicly debated with Phya-pa Chos-kyi seng-ge (1109–1169) on madhyamaka subjects at Gsang-phu ne'u-thog monastery, of which the latter was abbot for eighteen years, most likely from 1152 to 1169, which resulted in a public defeat for him by that unique thinker who was one of Tibet's few, but foremost opponents of the *prāsaṇgika-madyamaka. The great Gser-mdog Paṇ-chen Śākya-mchog ldan (1428–1507) writes that he thereafter left Tibet for Mount Wutai. In this connection, it is rather curious that he also writes . . . that Jayānanda had composed the Madhayamakāvatāravṛtti in Tibet. This work was not very much studied in later times, akthough a notable exception seems to have been Tsong-kha-pa, who cites it severally in some of his major writings, and then usually in a highly critical vein, particularly in connection with its "Tibetan followers." His influence in Tibet was nonetheless not inconsiderable. Among his many disciples, we should count Rma-bya Brtson-'grus seng-ge (?–1185) who, in fact, wrote a commentary on the Tarkamudgarakārikā. So far, it seems that only his exegesis of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā has been presevered by way of a late nineteenth century Sde-dge blockprint. (Leonard W. J. van der Kuijp, "Jayānanda. A Twelfth Century Guoshi from Kashmir Among the Tangut." Central Asiatic Journal 37, no. 3/4 (1993): 188–97.)

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position: Provisional
Notes: *"Jayānanda is arguably the first scholar who indicated that the Uttaratantra is provisional within the Tibetan intellectual landscape." Wangchuk, Tsering, The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 14.
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Qualified Yes
If "Qualified", explain: Since he equates the teachings on buddha-nature as an expedient way to teach emptiness, all being have it because emptiness is pervasive.
Notes: Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 151.
Which Wheel Turning
Position:
Notes:
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position: Yogācāra
Notes: Though he was a followed of Madhyamaka, he likely equates the buddha-nature teachings with Yogācāra, as he deems both to be provisional.
Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position: 1
Notes: *Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 150.
  • "One problem with Jayānanda’s position is that, having asserted that the Buddha-nature doctrine is provisional, he utilizes it as an authoritative teaching for establishing the single-vehicle theory, which he takes to be a definitive teaching." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 152.
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities)
Notes:
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position: Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་)
Notes: *Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 148.
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position: