Paryudāsapratiṣedha: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Glossary-Tibetan=མ་ཡིན་དགག་ | |Glossary-Tibetan=མ་ཡིན་དགག་ | ||
|Glossary-Wylie=ma yin dgag | |Glossary-Wylie=ma yin dgag | ||
|Glossary-Phonetic=ma yin gak | |||
|Glossary-Devanagari=पर्युदासप्रतिषेध | |Glossary-Devanagari=पर्युदासप्रतिषेध | ||
|Glossary-Sanskrit=paryudāsapratiṣedha | |Glossary-Sanskrit=paryudāsapratiṣedha | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
|Glossary-EnglishRB=qualified negation | |Glossary-EnglishRB=qualified negation | ||
|Glossary-EnglishJH=affirming negation | |Glossary-EnglishJH=affirming negation | ||
|Glossary- | |Glossary-PartOfSpeech=Noun | ||
|Glossary-SourceLanguage=Sanskrit | |||
|Glossary-Definition=A negation that denies something in such a way that it clearly implies an alternative. | |||
|Glossary-RelatedTerms=prasajyapratiṣedha | |||
|Glossary-DefinitionTDC=dgag pa'i nang gses/ rang dngos su rtogs pa'i blo'am rang brjod pa'i sgras rang gi dgag bya bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan 'phen pa/ lhas sbyin tshon po nyin par zas mi za/ zhes pa lta bu/ tshon po yin pas zas za bar bstan cing/ nyin par zas za ba bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan te mtshan mor zas za ba don gyis 'phangs pa'o | |Glossary-DefinitionTDC=dgag pa'i nang gses/ rang dngos su rtogs pa'i blo'am rang brjod pa'i sgras rang gi dgag bya bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan 'phen pa/ lhas sbyin tshon po nyin par zas mi za/ zhes pa lta bu/ tshon po yin pas zas za bar bstan cing/ nyin par zas za ba bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan te mtshan mor zas za ba don gyis 'phangs pa'o | ||
|Glossary-DefinitionOther=In contrast to a nonimplicative negation—the linguistically-bound negation of deconstruction—an implicative negation (Sanskrit ''paryudāsa-pratiṣedha''; Tibetan ''ma yin dgag'') is the type of negation preferred by the proponents of “other-emptiness,” like the Jonang tradition, in the way they approach the ultimate truth. An implicative negation is a negation that points beyond its constructed identity to something other. In this case, the system of linguistic representation does not merely deconstruct itself and succumb to the absence of its self-referential self-destruction. Rather, it is understood to imply, or presume, something else. The classic example of an implicative negation is: “The fat Devadatta does not eat during the day.” | |Glossary-DefinitionOther=In contrast to a nonimplicative negation—the linguistically-bound negation of deconstruction—an implicative negation (Sanskrit ''paryudāsa-pratiṣedha''; Tibetan ''ma yin dgag'') is the type of negation preferred by the proponents of “other-emptiness,” like the Jonang tradition, in the way they approach the ultimate truth. An implicative negation is a negation that points beyond its constructed identity to something other. In this case, the system of linguistic representation does not merely deconstruct itself and succumb to the absence of its self-referential self-destruction. Rather, it is understood to imply, or presume, something else. The classic example of an implicative negation is: “The fat Devadatta does not eat during the day.” | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 27 September 2018
| Key Term | paryudāsapratiṣedha |
|---|---|
| In Tibetan Script | མ་ཡིན་དགག་ |
| Wylie Tibetan Transliteration | ma yin dgag |
| Devanagari Sanskrit Script | पर्युदासप्रतिषेध |
| Romanized Sanskrit | paryudāsapratiṣedha |
| Tibetan Phonetic Rendering | ma yin gak |
| English Standard | implicative negation |
| Karl Brunnhölzl's English Term | implicative negation |
| Richard Barron's English Term | qualified negation |
| Jeffrey Hopkin's English Term | affirming negation |
| Term Type | Noun |
| Source Language | Sanskrit |
| Basic Meaning | A negation that denies something in such a way that it clearly implies an alternative. |
| Related Terms | prasajyapratiṣedha |
| Definitions | |
| Tshig mdzod Chen mo | dgag pa'i nang gses/ rang dngos su rtogs pa'i blo'am rang brjod pa'i sgras rang gi dgag bya bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan 'phen pa/ lhas sbyin tshon po nyin par zas mi za/ zhes pa lta bu/ tshon po yin pas zas za bar bstan cing/ nyin par zas za ba bkag pa'i shul du chos gzhan te mtshan mor zas za ba don gyis 'phangs pa'o |
| Other Definitions |
In contrast to a nonimplicative negation—the linguistically-bound negation of deconstruction—an implicative negation (Sanskrit paryudāsa-pratiṣedha; Tibetan ma yin dgag) is the type of negation preferred by the proponents of “other-emptiness,” like the Jonang tradition, in the way they approach the ultimate truth. An implicative negation is a negation that points beyond its constructed identity to something other. In this case, the system of linguistic representation does not merely deconstruct itself and succumb to the absence of its self-referential self-destruction. Rather, it is understood to imply, or presume, something else. The classic example of an implicative negation is: “The fat Devadatta does not eat during the day.” While this statement is explicitly a negation, the connotative force of the statement implies something else: that he eats at night. This leaves the interpreter with an unstated, yet implied, state of affairs. In contrast, when we consider the classic example of a nonimplicative negation, “Brahmins should not drink alcohol,” we can see how the connotative force of this negation is simple denial devoid of implication.
|