Bcom ldan rig pa'i ral gri: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*"Given Rikrel's interpretation of the ''Uttaratantra'', it is no wonder that later Jonang scholars would retrospectively include him in the Jonang lineage of other-emptiness transmission, even though he does not employ terms such as "other-emptiness" and "all-basis-gnosis" (''kun gzhi ye shes''), which would become crucial for Dölpopa's presentation of tathāgata-essence." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 30. | *"Given Rikrel's interpretation of the ''Uttaratantra'', it is no wonder that later Jonang scholars would retrospectively include him in the Jonang lineage of other-emptiness transmission, even though he does not employ terms such as "other-emptiness" and "all-basis-gnosis" (''kun gzhi ye shes''), which would become crucial for Dölpopa's presentation of tathāgata-essence." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 30. | ||
|PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | |PosAnalyticMedit=Meditative Tradition | ||
|PosAnalyticMeditNotes=Though perhaps not explicitly fitting into this category, Kano states | |PosAnalyticMeditNotes=Though perhaps not explicitly fitting into this category, Kano states, | ||
*"His understanding of Buddha-nature is compatible with that of the tradition of bTsan Kha-bo-che, which defines Buddha-nature as the “natural luminous mind,” and also in accordance with Dol-po-pa’s stance, which sees the Buddha-nature teaching being echoed in tantric literature." [[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 342. | |||
*And, "...it is obvious that bCom-ldan-ral-gri does not follow rNgog’s reasoning that leads to identifying Buddha-nature with emptiness." [[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 316. | |||
|PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | |PosEmptyLumin=Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature | ||
|PosEmptyLuminNotes="In his commentary on RGV I.3, bCom-ldan-ral-gri defines Buddha-nature as “the natural luminous mind that is inseparable from ''dharmatā'',” and, glossing RGV 1.153, states: “the ultimate truth, which is unconditioned and primordially existent by itself, is the element (i.e. Buddha-nature).” [[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 342. (see also Ibid. p. 315.) | |PosEmptyLuminNotes="In his commentary on RGV I.3, bCom-ldan-ral-gri defines Buddha-nature as “the natural luminous mind that is inseparable from ''dharmatā'',” and, glossing RGV 1.153, states: “the ultimate truth, which is unconditioned and primordially existent by itself, is the element (i.e. Buddha-nature).” [[Kano. K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 342. (see also Ibid. p. 315.) | ||
|IsInGyatsa=No | |IsInGyatsa=No | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 14:40, 8 August 2018
PersonType | Category:Classical Tibetan Authors |
---|---|
MainNamePhon | Chomden Rikpai Raldri |
MainNameTib | བཅོམ་ལྡན་རིག་པའི་རལ་གྲི་ |
MainNameWylie | bcom ldan rig pa'i ral gri |
AltNamesTib | བཅོམ་ལྡན་རལ་གྲི་ · བཅོམ་ལྡན་རིགས་པའི་རལ་གྲི་ · རིག་རལ་ · དར་མ་རྒྱལ་མཚན་ |
AltNamesWylie | bcom ldan ral gri · bcom ldan rigs pa'i ral gri · rig ral · dar ma rgyal mtshan |
AltNamesOther | Rikrel · bCom-ldan-ral-gri |
YearBirth | 1227 |
YearDeath | 1305 |
BornIn | lho kha (dbus) |
TibDateGender | Female |
TibDateElement | Fire |
TibDateAnimal | Pig |
TibDateRabjung | 4 |
TibDateDeathGender | Female |
TibDateDeathElement | Wood |
TibDateDeathAnimal | Snake |
TibDateDeathRabjung | 5 |
ReligiousAffiliation | Kadam |
ClassicalProfAff | snar thang dgon pa |
StudentOf | mchims nam mkha' grags · skyo ston smon lam tshul khrims |
TeacherOf | skyi ston shAkya 'bum · snye mdo kun dga' bzang po |
BDRC | https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P1217 |
Treasury of Lives | https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Chomden-Rigpai-Reldri/TBRC_P1217 |
IsInGyatsa | No |
BnwShortPersonBio | Famous Kadam scholar connected with Nartang (snar thang) monastery. His collected works are said to have once filled sixteen volumes and includes the earliest extant Tibetan commentary on the Uttaratantra that cites both tantric and sutric sources to corroborate the claims made in the treatise. |
PosBuNayDefProv | Definitive |
PosBuNayDefProvNotes | "In the opening part of his commentary, bCom-ldan-ral-gri defines the RGV as a treatise that imparts the definitive teaching of the Mahāyāna... bCom-ldan-ral-gri further characterizes the doctrine of Buddha-nature as definitive." Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, pp. 314-315. |
PosAllBuddha | Yes |
PosAllBuddhaMoreNotes | "Rikrel, in contrast to Sapen and other scholars at Sakya monastery, argues that all sentient beings have an inherent buddha endowed with enlightened qualities within." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 29. |
PosWheelTurn | Third Turning |
PosWheelTurnNotes | According to Wangchuk, Tsering, "Rikrel not only situates the Uttaratantra within sutric Mahāyāna literature, but he also includes it in the last wheel as a work expounding on both sutras and tantric literature." The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 29.
|
PosZhenRang | Zhentong |
PosZhenRangNotes | This assertion is applied retroactively since he predates the category.
|
PosAnalyticMedit | Meditative Tradition |
PosAnalyticMeditNotes | Though perhaps not explicitly fitting into this category, Kano states,
|
PosEmptyLumin | Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature |
PosEmptyLuminNotes | "In his commentary on RGV I.3, bCom-ldan-ral-gri defines Buddha-nature as “the natural luminous mind that is inseparable from dharmatā,” and, glossing RGV 1.153, states: “the ultimate truth, which is unconditioned and primordially existent by itself, is the element (i.e. Buddha-nature).” Kano. K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 342. (see also Ibid. p. 315.) |
Other wikis |
If the page does not yet exist on the remote wiki, you can paste the tag |
"Tathagatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.