Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Mi nyag bla ma ye shes rdo rje  + ("YDC denies that the ''Uttaratantra'' is a work that belongs to Mere Mentalism." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 310.)

• Mi nyag bla ma ye shes rdo rje  +
• Bu ston rin chen grub  + (In line with his assertion that these teac … In line with his assertion that these teachings are merely provisional he claims, "The general basis of intention of the teachings on buddha nature is the ālaya-consciousness, which refers to the sheer cause of buddhahood." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 868.When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 868.)
• Btsan kha bo che  + (Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ng … Karl cites Kongtrul stating, "TOK calls Ngog’s tradition of the Maitreya texts "the oral transmission of explanation" (''bshad pa’i bka’ babs'') and Dsen’s lineage, "the oral transmission of practice" (''sgrub pa’i bka’ babs''), saying that they are asserted to hold the views of Madhyamaka and Mere Mentalism, respectively." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 124.ouds Part]]'', p. 124.)
• Ratnākaraśānti  + (There are apparently different takes on th … There are apparently different takes on this issue, particularly whether he was a Yogācāran who accepted Madhyamaka or whether he was a Mādhyamika who accepted Yogācāra:</br>#Nirākāra Vijñānavāda, though as Kano states: "he defines the Madhyamaka position in accordance with the ''Madhyāntavibhāga's'', description of the “middle way.” Indeed, he repeats throughout his works that the doctrine of the Mādhyamikas and that of the Yogācāras are completely compatible." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 73.</br>#"In sum, in his works Ratnākaraśānti generally sees himself as a Mādhyamika, but one who integrates many essential elements of Yogācāra and the teachings on buddha nature, such as emphasizing the soteriologically crucial role of mind’s nature being nondual lucid self-awareness—the tathāgata heart—which is only obscured by adventitious stains and needs to be experienced in an unmediated manner as what it truly is." [[Brunnhölzl, K.]], ''[[When the Clouds Part]]'', p. 61..)