Difference between revisions of "Gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med"

From Tsadra Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
|PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka
 
|PosYogaMadhya=Madhyamaka
 
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes="Nevertheless, even though the ''Uttaratantra'' and the sutras on which the ''Uttaratantra'' is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'', Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the ''Uttaratantra'' teach emptiness. He argues:
 
|PosYogaMadhyaNotes="Nevertheless, even though the ''Uttaratantra'' and the sutras on which the ''Uttaratantra'' is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'', Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the ''Uttaratantra'' teach emptiness. He argues:
 
+
'The sutras for the ''Uttaratantra'' and the ''Uttaratantra'' [itself] do not contradict the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' because the emptiness of inherent existence of all phenomena taught there [in the''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''] is the dharma-body explicated here [in the last wheel sutras and the ''Uttaratantra''].'" [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 33.
The sutras for the ''Uttaratantra'' and the ''Uttaratantra'' [itself] do not contradict the ''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras'' because the emptiness of inherent existence of all phenomena taught there [in the''Prajñāpāramitāsūtras''] is the dharma-body explicated here [in the last wheel sutras and the ''Uttaratantra'']." [[Wangchuk, Tsering]]. ''[[The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows]]'', p. 33.
 
 
|PosVehicles=1
 
|PosVehicles=1
 
|PosVehiclesNotes="Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 327.
 
|PosVehiclesNotes="Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." [[Kano, K.]], ''[[Buddha-Nature and Emptiness]]'', p. 327.

Revision as of 09:28, 8 August 2018

Gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med on the DRL

གསང་ཕུ་བ་བློ་གྲོས་མཚུངས་མེད་
Wylie gsang phu ba blo gros mtshungs med
English Phonetics Sangpuwa Lodrö Tsungme
Dates
Birth:   14th Century
Place of birth:   dbus


Tibetan calendar dates

About
Religious Affiliation
Kadam
Students
g.yag sde paN chen · rang byung rdo rje

Other Biographical info:

See Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, pp. 320-324 on the various figures known as blo gros mtshungs med. Note that the BDRC person page likely conflates two of these figures, i.e. gsang phu ba and gnyal ba.

Links
BDRC Link
https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P63
Treasury of Lives Link
https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/blo-gros-mtshungs-med/P63
Wiki Pages


Buddha Nature Project
Person description or short bio
A Kadam scholar from Sangpu Neutok Monastery that was known for his expertise in the Five Treatises of Maitreya. He was a senior contemporary of both Dölpopa and Butön and a teacher of the Sakya scholar Yakde Paṇchen and the Third Karmapa Rangjung Dorje.

Expand to see this person's philosophical positions on Buddha-nature.

Is Buddha-nature considered definitive or provisional?
Position: Definitive
Notes: "Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the Uttaratantra in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings that are "exceedingly secret among the secrets," and that it teaches that all beings have a tathāgata-essence endowed with enlightened qualities." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 31.
All beings have Buddha-nature
Position: Yes
If "Qualified", explain:
Notes: *"He claims that tathāgata-essence exists in all sentient beings in a fully enlightened form. He states that: the dharma-body is dharma-reality indivisible from [buddha] qualities. Since there is no objection to the fact that the dharma-body exists pervasively in all sentient beings, in the manner of one entity; it is unacceptable to present it, [i.e., the existence of the dharma-body in sentient beings] as [merely] imputed." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 32.
  • "Blo-gros mtshungs-med asserts that... sentient beings truly possess the dharmakāya, which is the dharmadhātu inseparable from the qualities." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 329.
Which Wheel Turning
Position: Third Turning
Notes: "Sangpu Lodrö's commentary frames the Uttaratantra in a positive light, arguing that it is a commentary on definitive sutras included in the last-wheel teachings..." Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 31.
Yogācāra vs Madhyamaka
Position: Madhyamaka
Notes: "Nevertheless, even though the Uttaratantra and the sutras on which the Uttaratantra is based occupy a position of higher scriptural authority than the middle-wheel teachings of the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras, Sangpu Lodrö claims that both the middle-wheel scriptures and the Uttaratantra teach emptiness. He argues:

'The sutras for the Uttaratantra and the Uttaratantra [itself] do not contradict the Prajñāpāramitāsūtras because the emptiness of inherent existence of all phenomena taught there [in thePrajñāpāramitāsūtras] is the dharma-body explicated here [in the last wheel sutras and the Uttaratantra].'" Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 33.

Zhentong vs Rangtong
Position:
Notes:
Promotes how many vehicles?
Position: 1
Notes: "Blo-gros-mtshungs-med for his part is more intent on harmonizing the expression in the RGV with other scriptures, and probably was fully conscious of the fact that lack of reverence for śrāvakas contradicted his ekayāna stance." Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 327.
Analytic vs Meditative Tradition
Position:
Notes:
What is Buddha-nature?
Position: Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya
Notes: *Wangchuk, Tsering. The Uttaratantra in the Land of Snows, p. 32.
  • "One of the central doctrinal points of Blo-gros-mtshungs-med’s position is the two modes of Buddha-nature: the gnosis aspect and sphere aspect. Under the former, Buddha-nature is existent in terms of its qualities, while under the latter it is empty in terms of its mode of existence. Kano, K., Buddha-Nature and Emptiness, p. 336.
Svātantrika (རང་རྒྱུད་) vs Prāsaṅgika (ཐལ་འགྱུར་པ་)
Position:
Notes:
Causal nature of the vajrapāda
Position:

"Tathagatagarbha as the Dharmakaya" is not in the list (Tathāgatagarbha as Mind's Luminous Nature, Tathāgatagarbha as the Unity of Emptiness and Luminosity, Tathāgatagarbha as a Causal Potential or Disposition (gotra), Tathāgatagarbha as the Resultant State of Buddhahood, There are several types of Tathāgatagarbha, Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is a Non-implicative Negation (without enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Emptiness That is an Implicative Negation (with enlightened qualities), Tathāgatagarbha as the Latent State of Buddhahood that is Obscured in Sentient Beings, Tathāgatagarbha was Taught Merely to Encourage Sentient Beings to Enter the Path) of allowed values for the "PosEmptyLumin" property.