Samudānītagotra: Difference between revisions

From Tsadra Commons
(Created page with "{{GlossaryEntry |Glossary-Term=samudānītagotra |Glossary-Tibetan=ཡང་དག་པར་བསྒྲུབ་པའི་རིགས་ |Glossary-Wylie=yang dag par bsg...")
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|Glossary-SourceLanguage=Sanskrit
|Glossary-SourceLanguage=Sanskrit
|Glossary-Definition=a disposition that is acquired, or accentuated, through past karmic actions
|Glossary-Definition=a disposition that is acquired, or accentuated, through past karmic actions
|Glossary-Senses=a potential that is developed through personal of habits of study, practice, and exposure to a particular vehicle of Buddhism
|Glossary-Senses=fluidity in that it is a potential that is developed through personal of habits of study, practice, and exposure to a particular vehicle of Buddhism
|Glossary-DefinitionPDB=In the
|Glossary-DefinitionPDB=In the
Yogācāra school, a distinction is made between the indestructible,
Yogācāra school, a distinction is made between the indestructible,
inherent “naturally endowed lineage” (prakrtisthagotra)
inherent “naturally endowed lineage” (prakrtisthagotra) and this changeable, continuously acquired “lineage conditioned by habits” (samudānītagotra). In contrast to the former, which predetermines a person’s orientation toward the two vehicles of either Mahāyāna or Hinayāna, the latter allows for some leeway for personal adaptations and change through doctrinal study, practice, and exposure (these are what are meant by “habits”). According to this controversial Yogäcära tenet, whereas a person cannot effect change in terms of his highest spiritual potential and vehicular predisposition because of his “naturally endowed lineage,” he can nevertheless influence the speed with which he is able to attain enlightenment, and other extrinsic variations within his predetermined “lineage.” This flexibility is the lineage that is conditioned, and can be altered, by “habits.” Together and in contrast with the “naturally endowed lineage,” they are known as “the two lineages: intrinsic and acquired” (xingxi er [zhong] xing).
and this changeable, continuously acquired “lineage conditioned
by habits” (samudānītagotra). In contrast to the former,
which predetermines a person’s orientation toward the two
vehicles of either Mahäyäna or hInayäna, the latter allows for
some leeway for personal adaptations and change through doctrinal
study, practice, and exposure (these are what are meant
by “habits”). According to this controversial Yogäcära tenet,
whereas a person cannot effect change in terms of his highest
spiritual potential and vehicular predisposition because of his
“naturally endowed lineage,” he can nevertheless influence the
speed with which he is able to attain enlightenment, and other
extrinsic variations within his predetermined “lineage.” This
flexibility is the lineage that is conditioned, and can be altered,
by “habits.” Together and in contrast with the “naturally
endowed lineage,” they are known as “the two lineages: intrinsic
and acquired” (xingxi er [zhong] xing).
}}
}}

Revision as of 09:33, 15 May 2018

Key Term samudānītagotra
In Tibetan Script ཡང་དག་པར་བསྒྲུབ་པའི་རིགས་
Wylie Tibetan Transliteration yang dag par bsgrub pa’i rigs
Devanagari Sanskrit Script समुदानीतगोत्र
Romanized Sanskrit samudānītagotra
Chinese Script 習所成種性
Chinese Pinyin xí suǒ chéng zhǒng xìng
Japanese Transliteration shūshushō
English Standard lineage conditioned by habits
Jeffrey Hopkin's English Term truly established lineage
Term Type Noun
Source Language Sanskrit
Basic Meaning a disposition that is acquired, or accentuated, through past karmic actions
Has the Sense of fluidity in that it is a potential that is developed through personal of habits of study, practice, and exposure to a particular vehicle of Buddhism
Definitions
Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism

In the Yogācāra school, a distinction is made between the indestructible,

inherent “naturally endowed lineage” (prakrtisthagotra) and this changeable, continuously acquired “lineage conditioned by habits” (samudānītagotra). In contrast to the former, which predetermines a person’s orientation toward the two vehicles of either Mahāyāna or Hinayāna, the latter allows for some leeway for personal adaptations and change through doctrinal study, practice, and exposure (these are what are meant by “habits”). According to this controversial Yogäcära tenet, whereas a person cannot effect change in terms of his highest spiritual potential and vehicular predisposition because of his “naturally endowed lineage,” he can nevertheless influence the speed with which he is able to attain enlightenment, and other extrinsic variations within his predetermined “lineage.” This flexibility is the lineage that is conditioned, and can be altered, by “habits.” Together and in contrast with the “naturally endowed lineage,” they are known as “the two lineages: intrinsic and acquired” (xingxi er [zhong] xing).